Overall Vote Recommendation

Yes

Principle Criteria

Free Enterprise

Property Rights

Personal Responsibility

Limited Government

Individual Liberty

Digest

HB 5525, titled the Youth Parole Reform Act, proposes a targeted overhaul of parole guidelines for individuals convicted of crimes committed before the age of 18. The bill mandates the Board of Pardons and Paroles, working with the Texas Juvenile Justice Department, to create a separate set of parole guidelines specifically tailored to youth offenders. These youth-focused guidelines must prioritize rehabilitation, educational and vocational development, mental health support, and reintegration into society, distinguishing them from the adult parole framework currently in use.

The legislation requires that parole panels evaluating such inmates apply only the youth-specific guidelines and not the general adult criteria. Panels must also consider mitigating factors such as the offender’s age at the time of the offense, evidence of rehabilitation, psychological assessments, and statements from relevant professionals, family members, or victims. Importantly, HB 5525 incorporates modern neuroscience and legal precedents into parole decision-making by recognizing the reduced culpability and higher capacity for change among adolescents.

Further, HB 5525 requires the Board to produce an annual report to the governor and legislature. This report will include statistics on youth considered and released under the new guidelines, their reintegration outcomes, and recidivism rates, along with recommendations for improvement. The bill also calls for training for parole board members on best practices for handling cases involving youth offenders. By institutionalizing these changes, HB 5525 aims to bring Texas parole procedures into alignment with constitutional standards and contemporary understandings of adolescent development.

The substitute version of HB 5525 reflects a more expansive and refined approach to juvenile parole reform compared to the originally filed bill. While the core intent remains consistent—creating youth-specific parole guidelines for individuals convicted of crimes committed before age 18—the substitute bill introduces a more comprehensive statutory framework and adds philosophical, procedural, and accountability enhancements.

Structurally, the originally filed bill created a single new section of the Government Code (§508.1441), laying out procedural reforms for parole consideration, including the development of guidelines, factors for parole panels to consider, and annual reporting. The substitute version, however, splits these elements into two new statutory sections (§508.1441 and §508.1442). This separation not only improves clarity but also allows the bill to explicitly incorporate broader legal and developmental considerations into the parole process, such as recognition of youth’s diminished culpability, hallmark features of adolescence, and their increased capacity for change.

Substantively, the substitute bill adds stronger legal and constitutional grounding. By including language that parole decisions must provide a "meaningful opportunity to obtain release" and requiring parole panels to treat youth status as a mitigating factor, the substitute aligns the legislation with U.S. Supreme Court precedent on juvenile sentencing. These concepts were absent from the original bill, which focused more narrowly on procedures without referencing underlying legal principles or the rehabilitative philosophy behind the reforms.

Additionally, the originally filed version included a transitional provision requiring the Board of Pardons and Paroles to reconsider previously denied parole cases under the new guidelines. This forward-looking mechanism was removed in the substitute version, potentially to streamline implementation or reduce administrative complexity. Meanwhile, the substitute bill increases transparency by directing the board to coordinate with the Legislative Budget Board for data accuracy and to publish annual reports online, enhancing public accountability.

In sum, the substitute version of HB 5525 deepens the policy’s legal and developmental rationale, strengthens its procedural structure, and elevates its transparency measures, signaling a more mature and rights-focused approach to youth parole reform.

Author

Jolanda Jones

Contact the Author

Rep. Jolanda Jones

Capitol Phone:

(512) 463-0524

Capitol Office:

EXT E2.908

E-Mail:

[email protected]

Visit Official Website

Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), the fiscal implications of HB 5525 project a one-time cost of $300,000 to the state’s General Revenue Fund during the 2026 fiscal year. This cost is attributed to the development and implementation of a new parole guideline instrument tailored specifically for individuals who committed offenses before turning 18. The Board of Pardons and Paroles anticipates contracting a vendor to carry out the technical work needed to create this youth-specific framework in compliance with the bill's provisions.

Beyond this initial cost, there are no anticipated fiscal impacts in the subsequent years through 2030. The fiscal note explicitly states that the bill does not itself appropriate funds but would provide the legal basis for appropriations if the legislature chooses to allocate resources for implementation. It also finds no significant fiscal implications for local governments, indicating that the responsibilities under the bill are primarily administrative and centralized within state-level agencies.

While the up-front expense is modest, it represents an investment in evidence-based and developmentally informed parole practices. Long-term fiscal impacts—such as potential cost savings from reduced recidivism or decreased incarceration durations for rehabilitated youth—are not quantified in the fiscal note but remain possible indirect benefits of the bill’s implementation.

Vote Recommendation Notes

HB 5525 is grounded in well-established developmental and constitutional principles, aiming to ensure that individuals who committed crimes as minors are evaluated for parole using criteria that reflect their unique capacity for change and rehabilitation. Current law treats youth and adult offenders identically in parole decisions, contrary to recent research and U.S. Supreme Court rulings. HB 5525 corrects this by requiring the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles to implement youth-specific guidelines that prioritize rehabilitation, mental health treatment, education, and reintegration.

From a policy perspective, the substitute version further strengthens the original bill by incorporating additional parole considerations such as diminished culpability, hallmark features of youth, and greater capacity for change. It mandates that age at the time of the offense be treated as a mitigating factor and ensures that the parole process includes meaningful opportunities for input from individuals familiar with the offender’s development. These provisions significantly enhance the bill’s alignment with liberty principles, particularly Individual Liberty and Limited Government, by promoting individualized justice and reducing reliance on blanket incarceration policies.

The fiscal note estimates a one-time cost of $300,000 in FY2026 to develop the new parole guidelines, but no recurring fiscal impact is expected thereafter. This modest expenditure is a reasonable investment in creating a fairer, more developmentally appropriate parole process. Moreover, while not quantified, the potential long-term savings from reduced recidivism and lower incarceration rates could offset this initial cost.

In sum, HB 5525 is a thoughtful, constitutionally sound, and fiscally responsible reform that enhances due process, upholds personal responsibility through rehabilitation incentives, and limits government overreach. The bill addresses a genuine gap in the parole system with minimal fiscal burden and significant potential social benefit. As such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 5525.

Individual Liberty: The bill directly enhances individual liberty by mandating parole panels to consider the diminished culpability and greater capacity for change among youth. This individualized consideration ensures that young people are not subjected to overly punitive standards that fail to account for their developmental stage. By requiring a parole process that includes assessments of psychological and behavioral development, rehabilitation progress, and input from supportive individuals, the legislation reinforces protections for the most vulnerable individuals within the justice system.
Personal Responsibility: The bill promotes personal responsibility by incentivizing rehabilitation. Inmates who committed crimes as minors are rewarded for educational attainment, vocational training, and behavioral growth. Rather than imposing blanket punishment, the bill reinforces that individuals can earn their way back into society by demonstrating maturity and personal development. This shift from purely punitive to rehabilitative philosophy aligns well with the idea that liberty is preserved through self-governance and accountability.
Free Enterprise: While the bill does not directly affect business regulations or economic markets, it has indirect but meaningful implications for the principle of free enterprise. By prioritizing rehabilitation and reintegration for youth offenders, the bill supports policies that prepare individuals to reenter the workforce with improved education, vocational skills, and behavioral support. This increases the likelihood that formerly incarcerated youth will contribute productively to the economy rather than becoming long-term burdens on the state. Over time, reducing recidivism and enhancing employability through parole reform can bolster workforce readiness and reduce costs associated with incarceration, indirectly strengthening the conditions for a freer and more inclusive labor market.
Private Property Rights: The bill has no substantive effect on private property rights. It neither expands nor restricts the legal framework governing property ownership, use, or seizure. However, by establishing fairer and more individualized justice procedures, it indirectly supports a legal culture that values due process, a foundational safeguard for protecting property rights. Still, these effects are peripheral, and the bill should be considered neutral on this principle in its direct application.
Limited Government: The bill also supports limited government by making the parole process more efficient and just. It curbs state overreach by eliminating the automatic application of adult parole guidelines to youth offenders, a practice that can lead to prolonged, unnecessary incarceration. Furthermore, by requiring annual public reporting and collaboration with the Legislative Budget Board, the bill adds oversight and transparency, fostering government accountability rather than bureaucratic expansion.

View Bill Text and Status