Estimated Time to Read: 7 minutes
The Texas Legislature will return to Austin for a special session on July 21st, where one issue looms above the rest: redistricting. This time, the lines they draw won’t just shape state politics; they’ll help determine the partisan balance of the U.S. House of Representatives.
The state isn’t redistricting due to new census data but because of a seismic federal court ruling, political pressure from Washington, and the potential to redraw the congressional battlefield before the 2026 elections. This effort will put four congressional districts on the agenda.
Legal Pressure: Petteway v. Galveston County Changed the Rules
The trigger for this redistricting session was a 2024 en banc decision from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. In Petteway v. Galveston County, the court struck down 36 years of precedent and ruled that the Voting Rights Act (VRA) does not allow “coalition” districts, where two or more minority groups combine to form a majority.
That ruling overturned Campos v. City of Baytown (1988), which had long permitted Black and Hispanic voters to be treated as a single legal coalition in redistricting cases. Now, such coalitions are no longer valid in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.
The court held that Section 2 of the VRA protects “a class” of citizens, not multiple distinct classes acting together. This means Texas lawmakers can no longer justify majority-minority districts built from overlapping racial and ethnic groups. The legal floor has shifted, and the Legislature must respond.
DOJ Demands Action and Trump Demands Seats
In July, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) sent Governor Greg Abbott (R) a letter identifying four congressional districts, TX-9, TX-18, TX-29, and TX-33, as unconstitutional coalition districts that must be redrawn. Governor Abbott quickly added redistricting to the special session agenda, citing “constitutional concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice”.
But this isn’t just about legal compliance. President Donald Trump (R) publicly stated he wants Texas Republicans to pick up five congressional seats through redistricting.
“I think we’ll get five,” Trump told reporters. “Texas would be the biggest one.”
The redistricting process is where national political priorities and state legislative power collide.
Four Districts, One Goal: Reshaping Texas’s Map
The four targeted districts all currently lean Democratic and rely on “coalition” voting strength.
- TX-9 (Houston): Seat currently held by Al Green (D)
- TX-18 (Houston): Seat currently vacant but previously held by Democrats
- TX-29 (Harris County): Seat currently held by Sylvia Garcia (D)
- TX-33 (Dallas–Fort Worth): Seat currently held by Marc Veasey (D)
The stakes are so high because redrawing these districts could disrupt long-standing minority representation and turn historically Democratic-safe seats into swing or Republican-leaning ones.
Texas Lawmakers Are in Charge, Not the Courts
This isn’t a court-imposed map or a bureaucratic redraw. The new maps will be drawn by Texas legislators because the power to define congressional districts lies in the hands of state lawmakers, and they know exactly what’s at stake.
Every line drawn could mean the difference between a Republican majority and a Democratic comeback in the U.S. House. State lawmakers are not only shaping Texas politics, they’re shaping the country’s future in Congress.
Who’s Drawing the Maps?
House Committee on Redistricting
In the Texas House, redistricting will likely be overseen by the Committee on Redistricting, barring a special committee appointment by House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R-Lubbock). The committee currently has 15 members, 8 Republicans and 7 Democrats, and is chaired by State Rep. Cody Vasut (R–Angleton). The other committee members include State Reps.:
- Vice-Chairman: Jon Rosenthal (D-Houston)
- Josey Garcia (D-San Antonio)
- Barbara Gervin-Hawkins (D-San Antonio)
- Bobby Guerra (D-Mission)
- Ryan Guillen (R-Rio Grande City)
- Cole Hefner (R-Mount Pleasant)
- Hillary Hickland (R-Belton)
- Jolanda Jones (D-Houston)
- Christian Manuel (D-Port Arthur)
- Tom Oliverson (R-Cypress)
- David Spiller (R-Jacksboro)
- Carl Tepper (R-Lubbock)
- Terry Wilson (R-Georgetown)
- Gene Wu (D-Houston)
While speculative, it is plausible that Speaker Burrows will appoint a special committee to handle the redistricting item on the special session agenda. Possible conflicts of interest and other factors may influence the Speaker’s decision on the makeup of this committee. For example, one current member of the standing committee, Rep. Jolanda Jones (D–Houston), is a declared candidate for TX-18, one of the districts expected to be redrawn.
Senate Outlook
The Senate currently lacks a standing redistricting committee. During the 88th Legislature (2023), Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick (R) created a Senate Special Committee on Redistricting with 11 members (7 Republicans, 4 Democrats). A similar committee is expected to be appointed ahead of the upcoming special session. With the Senate historically moving at Patrick’s pace, a partisan redraw is all but certain.
Quorum Break Threats Return: Will Democrats Walk Again?
The specter of another Democratic quorum break looms large over this special session, and for good reason. Redistricting has triggered walkouts before, and the political temperature is rising fast.
In 2003, 51 Democratic House members famously fled to Ardmore, Oklahoma, to block a Republican-led congressional redistricting push spearheaded by then-Speaker Tom Craddick (R-Midland) and U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R). That standoff stalled the process for four days until time ran out on the session. When Governor Rick Perry (R) called lawmakers back, Senate Democrats followed suit, fleeing to Albuquerque, New Mexico. The walkout lasted over a month, but Republicans eventually got their map and reshaped the congressional delegation for years.
History repeated in 2021 when House Democrats chartered planes to Washington, D.C., to block Republican election legislation. They remained gone for 38 days, stalling House business. Yet despite the theatrics, quorum was eventually restored, the bill passed, and the walkout ultimately had no real consequences as lawmakers kept their pay, titles, and committee assignments.
Now, with congressional redistricting on the special session agenda and President Trump publicly pushing for five new Republican seats, some Democrats and their national allies are calling for another walkout. U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D) appeared in D.C. alongside Texas Democrats and accused Governor Abbott of “conspiring to rig the map” in the wake of catastrophic Hill Country flooding.
Unlike in 2021, the consequences of breaking quorum could be more severe this time around. New House rules adopted in 2023 impose $500 fines for each unexcused absence, House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R-Lubbock) can strip vice chairmanships from absentees, and there is speculation that Governor Abbott could go further, seeking to declare the seats of absent lawmakers “vacant” if any walkout drags on.
So far, Abbott’s office hasn’t said whether such a move is on the table. But the signal is clear: a walkout would be a high-stakes gamble. With redistricting power and congressional control at stake, Republicans may not be as lenient this time.
Why This Fight Matters Beyond Texas
Texas is not just redrawing lines; it’s redefining who counts, how districts are constructed, and what kind of representation minorities can expect in the post-Petteway world.
Republicans see a rare opportunity: with the DOJ providing legal cover and Trump demanding results, this redistricting session could yield new GOP seats before the next midterms. Democrats, on the other hand, see a deliberate effort to reduce minority electoral influence under the guise of legal compliance.
This battle is about control of Congress, and at this moment, that control runs through Austin.
Conclusion: Power Is on the Line
When the dust settles from this special session, Texas will likely have a new congressional map. But it will also have set a precedent for how courts, legislatures, and political parties navigate the Voting Rights Act in a multiracial America post-Petteway.
This isn’t just a legal fix. It’s a political fight over who gets to draw the lines and who gets to cross them.
In Texas, where politics is never just politics, the stakes could not be higher.
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!