Estimated Time to Read: 4 minutes
A renewed New Mexico secession amendment is once again drawing national and regional attention. Lawmakers representing Lea County in southeastern New Mexico have reintroduced legislation that would create a pathway for voters to consider leaving New Mexico and potentially joining Texas. The proposal has prompted public reaction from Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R-Lubbock), who represents a portion of the Texas panhandle, and signaled support for the idea.
The measure reflects longstanding tensions between southeastern New Mexico and the political leadership in Santa Fe. Supporters argue that cultural, economic, and political differences have created what some describe as a disconnect between rural counties and the state capital. Critics view the proposal as symbolic and politically charged, questioning its practicality and long-term viability.
The issue now sits at the intersection of state sovereignty, local self-determination, and regional political identity.
Lea County Secession Movement and the Pathway to Join Texas
The Lea County secession movement is being advanced through a proposed New Mexico joint resolution. If enacted, the resolution would establish a process allowing counties to pursue a vote on whether to secede from New Mexico. The process would require voter approval and would ultimately depend on additional state and federal action.
Secession from a state and admission into another state is not a unilateral act. It would require approval by the New Mexico Legislature, the Texas Legislature, and the United States Congress. That constitutional reality makes the proposal far more complex than a simple county-level referendum.
Still, proponents, including the Texas House Speaker, argue that giving voters in Lea County the opportunity to decide is itself an important political statement. The region has historically leaned conservative and has strong economic ties to the oil and gas industry. Many residents believe that state-level policies in Santa Fe do not reflect their priorities.
The debate mirrors other efforts around the country where rural counties have explored redrawing state lines in response to perceived policy and cultural divides.
Burrows on Lea County Secession
Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows weighed in on the debate with a clear statement of support:
“Texas would gladly welcome Lea County back to Texas, where it rightfully belongs.”
Source: Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R-Lubbock), X Post 2.16.2026
That comment is significant for several reasons. First, it frames the issue not merely as a future annexation but as a historical correction. The suggestion that Lea County rightfully belongs to Texas invokes the region’s 19th-century territorial history and longstanding cross-border economic relationships.
Second, the statement signals that at least some Texas leadership is open to entertaining a serious discussion if the New Mexico secession amendment were to advance.
Burrows’s remarks also elevate the conversation beyond a local dispute. By referencing Texas’s willingness to welcome the county, he implicitly acknowledges the role of Texas state sovereignty in shaping its own borders, subject to constitutional procedures.
While the Speaker’s comment does not initiate formal legislative action in Texas, it underscores that the idea is not being dismissed outright at the highest levels of Texas government.
Key Takeaways from the Lea County Secession Proposal
The renewed New Mexico secession amendment has reopened a longstanding debate over southeastern New Mexico’s relationship with Santa Fe. The proposal seeks to create a pathway for Lea County voters to consider leaving New Mexico and potentially joining Texas.
Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows’ statement that Texas would gladly welcome Lea County back where it rightfully belongs adds weight to the discussion and signals openness within Texas leadership.
The process for secession and state boundary changes is constitutionally complex and would require multiple layers of approval, making any near-term outcome uncertain and almost assuredly unlikely.
Even if the proposal does not advance beyond the early stages, it reflects ongoing regional tensions over policy, economic priorities, and political identity. At its core, the Lea County secession debate raises enduring questions about local self-governance, state sovereignty, and how political communities define their boundaries in a federal system.
Whether symbolic or substantive, the conversation surrounding southeastern New Mexico’s potential alignment with Texas is unlikely to fade quietly.
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
