HB 3 seeks to address a recognized and serious problem in Texas’s emergency response infrastructure: the lack of interoperable communication systems among first responders. This issue was acutely demonstrated during the Smokehouse Creek Fire and Hill Country floods, where incompatible communication equipment impeded coordination and delayed emergency response efforts. The bill proposes to resolve this by creating the Texas Interoperability Council under the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM), tasked with developing and executing a statewide strategic plan for emergency communications, managing a grant program, and ultimately overseeing and approving certain local equipment purchases.
While the bill’s policy objective, improving interoperability and communications during disasters, is well-intentioned and responds to real-world failures, its structural and governance framework substantially conflicts with several core principles of limited government, transparency, and fiscal responsibility. The proposed council would be a new permanent bureaucratic entity, empowered with broad rulemaking authority, discretion over a state-administered grant program, and decision-making power over local public safety radio purchases. This represents a meaningful and ongoing expansion of state government.
Of significant concern is the bill’s exemption of the council from the Texas Administrative Procedure Act and certain open meetings requirements. These exemptions limit public oversight over decisions related to grant allocation, infrastructure development, and emergency response policy. The bill allows the council to deliberate and make decisions affecting local jurisdictions and statewide infrastructure behind closed doors. While protecting sensitive security information is a valid concern, the current language lacks sufficient guardrails to ensure transparency is preserved when national security interests are not directly implicated.
The fiscal implications of HB 3 are also notable. According to the Legislative Budget Board, the bill will result in a projected $5.75 million net negative impact on General Revenue over the next biennium, excluding the unknown cost of future grants. This includes new permanent staffing at TDEM (11.3 FTEs) and one-time capital expenditures. While improving emergency preparedness has budgetary merit, HB 3 commits state funds to a program that lacks clear limits, performance metrics, or sunset provisions, raising the risk of bureaucratic entrenchment and mission creep.
The bill also imposes state-level oversight on local public safety communication purchases. From 2026 to 2027, the Governor must approve local radio system procurements. Beginning in 2027, this authority shifts permanently to the council. This centralized review process not only delays local decision-making but may also discourage innovation and vendor competition by prioritizing narrow, top-down technical standards. These restrictions may burden local governments with compliance obligations that reduce autonomy and limit responsiveness to local needs.
In its current form, HB 3 creates a permanent and powerful state structure with broad discretion over funding, procurement, and policy, without adequate transparency or fiscal guardrails.
Therefore, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote NO on HB 3 unless amended as described. The bill conflicts with key liberty principles unless it undergoes meaningful revision to limit state overreach, enhance transparency, and preserve local responsibility and discretion. Without these reforms, the bill’s potential to centralize authority and expand bureaucracy outweighs the benefits of its intended emergency communication improvements.