According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), the fiscal implications of HB 13 reflect a moderate but sustained cost to the state, primarily through the creation and operation of the Texas Interoperability Council and the administration of a statewide grant program for emergency communication systems. The bill would result in a negative impact of approximately $5.75 million to General Revenue-related funds over the 2026–2027 biennium, with continued costs projected in future years.
To implement the bill, the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) would need to establish a dedicated leadership and support team, including a Division Chief, Program Specialists, a Section Chief, and several Systems Support Specialists. This staffing expansion would total approximately 11.3 new full-time equivalents, with annual salary and benefit costs estimated at $1.5 million and operating costs around $800,000. Additionally, a one-time capital expenditure of $1.1 million is anticipated in the fiscal year 2026 for the infrastructure and equipment necessary to launch the initiative.
These cost estimates are independent of any actual grant awards issued under the Council's authority, as the fiscal note does not project the number or scale of grants that may be funded. Moreover, while the bill does not appropriate funds directly, it provides the statutory framework that would support future appropriations to fund both administrative costs and grant disbursements. Notably, no significant fiscal impact on local governments is expected, as the grants would cover equipment and infrastructure costs they might otherwise bear.
In total, the bill presents a moderate and ongoing budgetary commitment for the state, mainly tied to personnel and operational needs rather than the full scale of the grant program itself. Appropriations decisions will ultimately determine the extent to which the Council can fulfill its grant-making functions.
HB 13 arises from urgent lessons learned during the 2024 Panhandle wildfires, where a lack of interoperable communication among first responders significantly impaired emergency response. The bill proposes the establishment of the Texas Interoperability Council to oversee a strategic communications plan and administer grants to local governments to upgrade or build compatible emergency communications infrastructure. This is a well-intentioned and necessary initiative that seeks to address a recognized gap in the state’s disaster response capabilities.
However, while the bill has clear merit in terms of improving public safety and emergency coordination, it contains several provisions that warrant amendment. Most notably, the Council is exempted from the state’s open meetings and public information laws. This exemption undermines core principles of transparency and public accountability, especially concerning an entity that will manage state funds and shape strategic emergency infrastructure policy. These transparency carve-outs should be limited or clarified to ensure that only sensitive security matters are shielded, not general decision-making or financial management.
Fiscally, the bill is projected to cost the state over $5.7 million in the upcoming biennium, largely driven by personnel, infrastructure, and operations costs—not including grant disbursements themselves. While the impact is manageable and justified by the need for improved emergency infrastructure, clearer appropriation mechanisms and accountability for expenditures would strengthen the bill’s alignment with principles of limited and responsible government.
In sum, the bill supports personal responsibility and public safety and could indirectly foster private sector participation in infrastructure development. However, the overbroad transparency exemptions conflict with the principles of limited government and individual liberty. As such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote NO unless the aforementioned amendments are adopted to include more robust oversight and transparency safeguards.