Overall Vote Recommendation

Yes

Principle Criteria

Free Enterprise

Property Rights

Personal Responsibility

Limited Government

Individual Liberty

Digest

HB 20 establishes the Applied Sciences Pathway Program, a new initiative within the Texas Education Code aimed at preparing high school students for in-demand technical careers through dual enrollment. Under the program, high school juniors and seniors will have the opportunity to concurrently earn both a high school diploma and an industry-recognized certificate from a partnering institution of higher education. The program is designed to target high-wage, high-growth industries such as welding, HVAC, robotics, aerospace engineering, IT, cybersecurity, and others.

The bill empowers the Texas Commissioner of Education to approve partnerships between school districts or open-enrollment charter schools and higher education institutions. These partnerships must provide a sequence of non-duplicative, progressively advanced coursework, culminating in certificate completion and potential job placement. Importantly, the program requires that all eligible students in grades 11 and 12 be allowed to participate, promoting equitable access.

To ensure the program remains relevant, the commissioner may revise the list of qualifying industries every five years, beginning with the 2027–2028 school year. These updates must reflect current labor market trends, allowing the program to adapt to evolving workforce needs. The governance of the program is to be defined through articulation agreements between educational partners, ensuring accountability and alignment across participating entities.

Overall, the Applied Sciences Pathway Program seeks to bridge the gap between secondary and postsecondary education, aligning student achievement with workforce demands and economic development priorities across Texas.

The Committee Substitute version of HB 20 reflects several important differences from the originally filed version that expand and clarify the scope and flexibility of the proposed Applied Sciences Pathway Program.

In the originally filed bill, the list of approved industries for certification was limited to ten areas, including plumbing, electrical, welding, carpentry, and HVAC. The Committee Substitute significantly broadens this scope to include twenty industries, adding fields such as robotics, cybersecurity, oil and gas, mechanical and aerospace engineering, and more. This expansion better aligns the program with modern workforce demands and technological innovation.

Another notable change is the introduction of Section (c-1) in the substitute version, which allows the Commissioner of Education to revise the approved industry list every five years beginning in the 2027–2028 school year. This provision is absent in the original bill and adds crucial adaptability to respond to shifting labor market trends over time.

The Committee Substitute also omits several prescriptive provisions found in the original bill, including the ability for career and technology education (CTE) courses to substitute for high school graduation credits under Section 28.025 and the specific rules limiting such substitutions to one credit and one subject area. Additionally, the originally filed bill included language about how time spent in the program would count toward average daily attendance calculations and clarified that earlier CTE participation wouldn’t preclude program eligibility—provisions not retained in the substitute.

These revisions collectively streamline the bill, enhance its responsiveness to future workforce needs, and potentially reduce administrative burdens while maintaining the original intent: enabling students to earn industry certifications alongside their high school diplomas through strategic educational partnerships.

Author

Gary Gates

Bradley Buckley

Keith Bell

Oscar Longoria

Trey Martinez Fischer

Co-Author

Daniel Alders

Alma Allen

Jeffrey Barry

Cecil Bell, Jr.

Salman Bhojani

Greg Bonnen

Ben Bumgarner

Angie Chen Button

Briscoe Cain

Elizabeth Campos

Terry Canales

Giovanni Capriglione

Sheryl Cole

David Cook

Philip Cortez

Tom Craddick

Charles Cunningham

Pat Curry

Drew Darby

Aicha Davis

Jay Dean

Mano DeAyala

Mark Dorazio

Paul Dyson

Caroline Fairly

Cassandra Garcia Hernandez

Josey Garcia

Stan Gerdes

Charlie Geren

Robert Guerra

Ryan Guillen

Sam Harless

Cody Harris

Caroline Harris Davila

Brian Harrison

Richard Hayes

Cole Hefner

Janis Holt

Andy Hopper

Lacey Hull

Todd Hunter

Carrie Isaac

Ann Johnson

Venton Jones

Helen Kerwin

Stan Kitzman

Marc LaHood

Suleman Lalani

Stan Lambert

Brooks Landgraf

Jeff Leach

Terri Leo-Wilson

Mitch Little

Janie Lopez

Ray Lopez

A.J. Louderback

J. M. Lozano

John Lujan

Shelley Luther

Christian Manuel

Don McLaughlin

John McQueeney

William Metcalf

Terry Meza

Brent Money

Joseph Moody

Penny Morales Shaw

Eddie Morales

Matt Morgan

Sergio Munoz, Jr.

Candy Noble

Tom Oliverson

Angelia Orr

Jared Patterson

Dennis Paul

Dade Phelan

Katrina Pierson

Mihaela Plesa

Richard Raymond

Ron Reynolds

Keresa Richardson

Jon Rosenthal

Nate Schatzline

Alan Schoolcraft

Joanne Shofner

Shelby Slawson

John Smithee

David Spiller

Valoree Swanson

Carl Tepper

Tony Tinderholt

Steve Toth

Ellen Troxclair

Gary Vandeaver

Cody Vasut

Denise Villalobos

Wesley Virdell

Hubert Vo

Trey Wharton

Terry Wilson

Sponsor

Charles Schwertner

Co-Sponsor

Cesar Blanco

Brent Hagenbuch

Adam Hinojosa

Juan Hinojosa

Lois Kolkhorst

Borris Miles

Kevin Sparks

Royce West

Judith Zaffirini

Contact the Author

Rep. Gary Gates

Capitol Phone:

(512) 463-0657

Capitol Office:

EXT E2.322

E-Mail:

[email protected]

Visit Official Website

Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), HB 20 is not expected to have a significant fiscal implication to the state. The Texas Education Agency and other relevant institutions are expected to absorb any administrative or implementation-related costs within their existing budgets and resources. This suggests that the program's rollout, at least at the state level, is not expected to require additional appropriations or funding.

However, the bill does present potential local fiscal impacts. Specifically, school districts and institutions of higher education that do not currently offer Applied Sciences programs would likely face startup and training costs. These could include expenses related to developing new curricula, hiring qualified instructors, acquiring specialized equipment or facilities, and establishing formal partnerships between secondary schools and colleges.

Although these costs may vary by region and institution size, the decentralized and partnership-based model proposed by the bill allows for flexible implementation. Institutions with existing infrastructure or those already engaged in dual-credit or workforce training programs may experience minimal additional expense, while others may require more substantial investment to participate fully. Overall, while fiscally neutral at the state level, the success of the program will depend in part on the capacity and willingness of local entities to absorb and manage initial setup costs.

Vote Recommendation Notes

HB 20 addresses a growing labor market crisis by creating a pipeline between Texas high schools and high-demand technical industries through the Applied Sciences Pathway Program. The bill responds directly to a shortage of skilled tradespeople—highlighted by workforce projections estimating the need for nearly a million new skilled laborers over a two-year span—by enabling students to concurrently earn a high school diploma and industry-recognized certifications. This approach provides an accelerated path to employment for young Texans and expands the talent pool available to key sectors of the Texas economy.

From a liberty-oriented policy lens, the bill supports several core principles. It promotes individual liberty and personal responsibility by empowering students to pursue self-directed, career-focused educational paths. It enhances free enterprise by ensuring that Texas industries have access to a workforce equipped with practical, job-ready skills. Although the bill establishes a state-directed program, its reliance on voluntary partnerships and local flexibility supports the principle of limited government without infringing on private property rights.

The Committee Substitute version improves upon the originally filed bill by expanding the list of eligible industries and granting the Commissioner of Education the authority to revise that list in response to changing market needs. These updates demonstrate an intentional effort to future-proof the legislation and align educational outputs with economic realities. Importantly, the bill analysis also notes that no significant fiscal impact is expected at the state level, while local costs are anticipated to be manageable and scalable depending on institutional capacity.

Taken together, HB 20 offers a thoughtfully designed, liberty-compatible solution to workforce development that fosters opportunity, economic vitality, and educational innovation across Texas. As such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 20.

View Bill Text and Status