According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), HB 2152 is projected to have a negative impact of $878,172 on the General Revenue Fund over the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill does not make an appropriation but would require additional appropriations to the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) to fulfill its new responsibilities.
Specifically, the PUC would need to hire three full-time employees (FTEs) to implement the bill’s requirements. These positions include an Attorney III–IV, an Economist III, and an Engineer III–V. Collectively, their salaries, benefits, and associated operational costs are estimated to cost about $439,086 annually. The agency also anticipates minor information technology expenditures of around $8,100 per year.
The fiscal impact is expected to continue at a similar annual cost through at least fiscal year 2030. While there could be local government impacts in the Permian Basin area due to expansion or upgrades of transmission and distribution lines, those effects could not be quantified at this time.
This bill focuses on a critical, proactive strategy to ensure the long-term reliability of electric transmission service in the Permian Basin, a region that plays a vital role in Texas's economy and energy production. Building on 2023 legislation (HB 5066), this bill refines existing law by requiring the Public Utility Commission (PUC) to direct ERCOT to update a detailed regional reliability plan every five years.
While ERCOT already conducts general, system-wide transmission planning, it tends to focus reactively on reliability violations across the whole ERCOT grid. Without specific legislative direction, ERCOT may not prioritize early investment and upgrades in the Permian Basin, even though that region's growth is highly unique and critical. HB 2152 ensures a proactive, ongoing focus on this key region, protecting grid reliability before shortages or emergencies arise.
Importantly, while the bill slightly grows the size of government, requiring three additional full-time employees at the PUC, it is a narrow, targeted expansion. It does not create new agencies, expand regulatory burdens on individuals or businesses, or impose new costs on the private sector. Instead, it focuses government activity solely on internal planning responsibilities to protect public infrastructure.
The bill carries a modest fiscal impact of approximately $878,172 over the 2026-2027 biennium, with about $439,086 in ongoing annual costs. While this represents a small increase in taxpayer-funded expenditures, it is a responsible and proportional investment considering the critical economic role of the Permian Basin and the massive risks posed by potential grid failures.
Concerns about government growth and spending are valid, but in this case, the expansion is minimal, clearly defined, and directly tied to maintaining essential services that support free enterprise, energy independence, and economic growth.
Ultimately, HB 2152 supports essential infrastructure planning without creating new regulatory burdens, while protecting Texas's broader economic interests, private property rights, and individual liberties. It reflects a responsible, limited-government solution to a major strategic challenge,e and as such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 2152.