89th Legislature

HB 255

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
Free Enterprise
Property Rights
Personal Responsibility
Limited Government
Individual Liberty
Digest
HB 255 proposes an amendment to the Texas Tax Code, specifically Section 11.16(c), to refine and clarify the definitions used for granting an ad valorem (property) tax exemption on farm products held by their producers. The legislation is designed to ensure a more accurate and consistent application of the exemption across the state by explicitly updating the terms “farm products” and “in the hands of the producer.”

The bill expands the definition of “farm products” by incorporating the broader meaning from Section 9.102 of the Business & Commerce Code while specifically including poultry, eggs, and timber—clarifying that standing timber is also covered. Additionally, it differentiates the ownership criteria required for exemption eligibility: for general farm products, the exemption applies if the owner is the one financially supporting or using the products on January 1 of the tax year; for timber, the exemption applies if the timber—either standing or harvested—remains on the original property and is still owned by the person who held title when it was standing.

This statutory clarification aims to prevent misinterpretation and inconsistency in property tax assessments, especially benefiting small to mid-sized agricultural and timber operations. Importantly, the bill’s provisions will only take effect if a proposed constitutional amendment authorizing the Legislature to define these terms is approved by Texas voters.

The originally filed version of HB 255 and the Committee Substitute are generally aligned in purpose but differ slightly in textual structure and the specificity of terms included. Both versions amend Section 11.16(c) of the Texas Tax Code to clarify the definitions for "farm products" and "in the hands of the producer" for ad valorem tax exemption purposes. However, there are notable distinctions in wording and inclusions.

In the originally filed version, the definition of "farm products" is tied to Section 9.102 of the Business & Commerce Code, with explicit inclusion of “poultry” and “timber, including standing timber.” The filed version removes “livestock” from the previously existing bracketed list, likely because it is already covered by the cross-referenced statutory definition.

In contrast, the Committee Substitute goes a step further by explicitly including "poultry, eggs, and timber" in the definition of farm products. The addition of "eggs" is a key distinction, indicating a clearer intent to extend the exemption to poultry-derived products, not just the animals themselves.

Regarding "in the hands of the producer," both versions use similar language to distinguish between general farm products and timber. However, the committee substitute improves clarity by reformatting the definitions into more distinct subpoints and reorganizing the grammar for easier interpretation.

Overall, the Committee Substitute refines the original version by expanding scope (through inclusion of “eggs”) and improving readability, while maintaining the original intent and contingent effective date based on constitutional amendment approval.
Author
Ryan Guillen
Janie Lopez
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), HB 255 is not expected to have a significant fiscal impact on the state. The bill’s main fiscal consequence would be a reduction in local taxable property values due to the expansion of the ad valorem tax exemption for farm products held by the producer. The revised definitions would exempt more items—including poultry, eggs, and timber (including standing timber)—from property taxes, potentially lowering the taxable base for school districts and local governments.

For the state, this exemption could cause a slight increase in state costs through the school finance formulas, as reductions in local property tax revenue may trigger additional state funding to meet required education spending levels. However, the LBB concludes that such costs are not anticipated to be significant.

At the local level, the impact depends on how taxing jurisdictions respond. Reduced taxable values would increase the no-new-revenue and voter-approval tax rates under Section 26.04 of the Tax Code. If local governments choose not to adopt higher tax rates, they would experience a reduction in revenue. Alternatively, if they adopt higher rates, they could offset losses by shifting some tax burden to non-exempt property owners, slightly diminishing the net benefit of the exemption for those receiving it.

Importantly, all fiscal impacts are contingent upon the passage of a constitutional amendment (HJR 31) that authorizes the legislature to define the relevant terms for the exemption. Without voter approval, the bill would have no fiscal effect.

Vote Recommendation Notes

HB 255 makes technical but meaningful updates to the Texas Tax Code by refining the definitions used to determine eligibility for an ad valorem tax exemption on farm products held by their producer. The bill addresses concerns raised by stakeholders about inconsistencies in how this exemption has been applied across different jurisdictions due to ambiguous or outdated definitions in current law. By referencing definitions from the Uniform Commercial Code and explicitly including poultry, eggs, and timber (including standing timber), the legislation promotes uniformity and fairness in the application of the tax exemption.

The bill’s design enhances predictability for producers and local tax authorities, reducing the risk of unequal tax treatment. It clarifies that ownership on January 1 and a financial or physical stake in the products are key criteria for determining exemption eligibility. These adjustments not only support agricultural and timber producers but also maintain a balanced approach by not expanding the exemption beyond what is necessary for fairness and administrative clarity.

From a liberty-oriented perspective, this legislation aligns well with the principles of private property rights, limited government, and free enterprise. It minimizes unnecessary taxation, empowers producers to retain more of their income, and supports rural economic activity without imposing new mandates or regulatory burdens.

In sum, HB 255 represents a well-crafted refinement of current tax policy that enhances equity and transparency without significantly impacting state revenue. As such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 255 for reinforcing fair taxation, reducing regulatory ambiguity, and respecting property rights in Texas agriculture and forestry.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill promotes individual liberty by ensuring that producers—especially small farmers, ranchers, and timberland owners—are not unfairly burdened with property taxes on goods they still own and manage. By clarifying eligibility for tax exemptions, HB 255 protects individuals from arbitrary or inconsistent taxation practices that could infringe on their economic freedom.
  • Personal Responsibility: By tying exemption eligibility to the ownership and provision of physical care or financial support for farm products, the bill underscores the value of personal responsibility. Only those actively managing or financially supporting the production are eligible, which discourages passive ownership schemes and rewards those taking on the risks and responsibilities of agricultural production.
  • Free Enterprise: The bill strengthens the free enterprise system by removing ambiguity and potential barriers to entry in the agricultural and timber markets. A fair and predictable tax environment encourages investment and entrepreneurship in farming, ranching, and timber production, sectors vital to Texas’s rural economy. Clearer tax rules foster a more level playing field, enabling producers to make decisions based on market forces rather than tax uncertainty.
  • Private Property Rights: The bill is fundamentally about protecting and affirming private property rights. It ensures that individuals retain the full benefits of ownership—specifically, exemption from taxation on their farm products—when they meet the criteria of active production and care. This clarification safeguards the right to use and enjoy one’s property without undue state interference.
  • Limited Government: Finally, the legislation reflects the principle of limited government by narrowing the scope of taxable property and emphasizing the need for constitutional authorization before taking effect. It curbs the expansion of government tax authority and reinforces that any such changes must be approved by voters, respecting constitutional limits and democratic accountability.
Related Legislation
View Bill Text and Status