According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), HB 2702 is not expected to have a significant fiscal impact on the state. The bill's primary function—exempting certain veterans’ organizations from executive orders that restrict business operations during states of disaster—does not create any new state programs, mandates, or direct appropriations that would burden the state budget. Any associated revenue implications or enforcement costs are expected to be negligible.
At the local government level, the bill likewise poses no significant fiscal implications. The affected organizations operate independently of city or county funding streams, and local jurisdictions would not incur administrative or enforcement costs resulting from the bill’s passage. The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, the Comptroller’s Office, and the Office of the Governor—agencies named in the fiscal note—are not anticipated to experience budgetary pressure or require additional staffing to implement the provisions of the bill.
Overall, HB 2702 appears fiscally neutral, aligning with the legislative intent to safeguard the operational continuity of veterans’ nonprofits without imposing costs on state or local entities. This minimal fiscal footprint may help ensure bipartisan support and ease of implementation.
HB 2702 is a narrowly tailored response to executive restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic that unintentionally harmed veteran-focused nonprofit organizations such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW). These organizations, which often serve as key community hubs through services like youth programs, civic events, and public support for veterans, were subjected to closure under blanket orders that applied to businesses earning more than 51% of revenue from alcohol sales. As a result, many VFW posts across Texas were shuttered, disrupting their ability to serve both their members and their communities.
The bill provides a carve-out to prevent such closures in future state-of-disaster declarations, as long as the disaster is not a natural one (e.g., a hurricane or flood). This maintains a safeguard for true emergencies while limiting executive overreach during broader emergency declarations like pandemics. Importantly, it does so without granting additional rulemaking authority or creating a new criminal offense, and the fiscal note confirms that implementation would have no significant cost to the state or local governments.
From a liberty-oriented perspective, HB 2702 upholds key principles of limited government, individual liberty, and private property rights. It curtails broad executive authority that could otherwise infringe on the autonomy of private, nonprofit institutions that provide vital public service. Additionally, by restricting only future executive action and preserving natural disaster authority, it reflects a balanced legislative response, rather than a sweeping rollback of emergency powers. This approach makes HB 2702 both principled and practical in its scope and execution. Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 2702.