According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), the fiscal implications of HB 2963 would not have a significant financial impact on the State of Texas. The implementation of its provisions—requiring original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) to make repair tools, parts, and documentation available to independent repair providers and consumers—is not expected to necessitate new appropriations or significant additional resources. Any costs associated with enforcing the bill, particularly by the Office of the Attorney General, are presumed to be absorbable within existing agency budgets.
Moreover, the bill contains a provision allowing the Office of the Attorney General to recover attorneys' fees and enforcement-related expenses from violators. This reimbursement mechanism further reduces the likelihood of long-term fiscal burden on the state, as enforcement actions could be self-funding when successful.
For local governments, the bill is also expected to have no significant fiscal implications. Because the enforcement authority resides exclusively with the Attorney General, local government units and their budgets are not anticipated to be affected by the bill's mandates or operations. In sum, HB 2963 is structured in a way that minimizes fiscal strain while enabling consumer rights and repair market access.
HB 2963 represents a targeted and balanced approach to establishing a right to repair framework in Texas, particularly for consumer digital electronic equipment. It promotes the core liberty principles of individual autonomy, free enterprise, and private property rights, while applying reasonable safeguards to protect trade secrets, cybersecurity, and public safety. The bill enables Texans and independent repair providers to access tools, documentation, and replacement parts that manufacturers often withhold—restrictions which have traditionally raised consumer costs, limited choice, and contributed to environmental waste.
The bill wisely incorporates clear boundaries, exempting critical sectors such as medical devices, motor vehicles, heavy equipment, emergency response systems, and game consoles. These exemptions reflect industry concerns and public safety realities, allowing the bill to advance repair rights without creating legal or operational conflicts in heavily regulated or high-risk areas. Moreover, the enforcement mechanism is both efficient and restrained: the Texas Attorney General is given exclusive authority to act after a 30-day cure period, and no private right of action is created—limiting frivolous litigation while enabling meaningful accountability.
From a fiscal perspective, the bill imposes no significant costs on the state or local governments, and it includes a provision allowing the Attorney General to recover enforcement-related expenses. Its delayed implementation date of September 1, 2026, offers manufacturers and the market ample time to prepare for compliance. Taken together, the bill affirms consumer rights and market freedom while respecting legitimate concerns from manufacturers, making it a sound, liberty-consistent policy proposal, and as such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 2963.