HB 3096 seeks to designate March 17 as Profound Autism Awareness Day in the state of Texas. The purpose of this commemorative day is to increase public awareness and understanding of individuals diagnosed with profound autism, a subset of the autism spectrum characterized by significant cognitive and communication challenges, often accompanied by lifelong dependency on caregivers.
The bill amends Subchapter C, Chapter 662 of the Texas Government Code by adding Section 662.089. This new section establishes the observance date and provides that the day may be commemorated with appropriate ceremonies and public activities. These activities may include distributing information about available resources and support services for individuals with profound autism and their families, as well as efforts to increase public understanding of the unique needs of this population.
Importantly, HB 3096 does not impose any mandates or require public funding. The observance is optional and symbolic, encouraging voluntary public participation and recognition.
The originally filed version of HB 3096 and the Committee Substitute are nearly identical in purpose and structure, with both bills proposing to designate March 17 as Profound Autism Awareness Day in Texas. However, there is one notable and substantive difference between the two versions: the use of the word “shall” in the originally filed bill versus “may” in the Committee Substitute.
In Section 662.089(b), the filed version states that “Profound Autism Awareness Day shall regularly be observed by appropriate ceremonies and activities,” which implies a prescriptive or expected level of observance. This could be interpreted to mean that the state or relevant entities are expected to recognize the day annually with some level of consistency or formality.
In contrast, the Committee Substitute changes this to: “Profound Autism Awareness Day may be regularly observed by appropriate ceremonies and activities,” which softens the language and clearly makes the observance optional rather than expected. This change aligns with the principle of limited government by ensuring the state does not appear to mandate or require any action, expenditure, or formal observance.
There are no other textual, structural, or substantive differences between the two versions. Both include the same background information about profound autism, describe the purpose of the observance, and have the same effective date.