According to he Legislative Budget Board (LBB) has determined that HB. 3332 would have no significant fiscal implication to the state. The LBB assumes that any costs associated with implementing the bill could be absorbed using existing resources, indicating that the establishment of the Maverick County Regional Mobility Authority (RMA) would not require additional state funding or appropriations.
From a local government perspective, the bill could have a positive fiscal impact on the Maverick County RMA if voters approve a fee through a referendum election as authorized by the bill. This potential revenue would help support transportation and mobility projects within the RMA's jurisdiction. However, the LBB also notes that other fiscal implications associated with the authority’s creation cannot be determined at this time. This uncertainty may stem from variables such as the level of voter support, the specific fee amount, and the scope of projects undertaken by the RMA.
In summary, while the bill is not expected to impose a financial burden on the state, it could generate local revenue if the fee is approved, with the extent of the financial impact dependent on future voter decisions and operational choices of the Maverick County RMA.
HB 3332 seeks to establish the Maverick County Regional Mobility Authority (RMA), which would give Maverick County the power to independently plan, finance, and implement transportation projects. While this aims to address local infrastructure needs, the proposal raises significant concerns related to limited government, free enterprise, and financial accountability.
The bill would create a new governmental entity with the authority to levy fees, expanding the scope of local government power. This contradicts the principle of limiting government intervention and risks setting a precedent for the creation of similar authorities across the state. Allowing regional mobility authorities to operate with fee-levying powers without the direct approval of the Texas Transportation Commission diminishes state-level oversight, raising questions about accountability.
Regional mobility authorities can inadvertently displace private sector initiatives by introducing public-sector competition into areas where private investment might otherwise address transportation needs. If a mobility project is economically viable, private companies would likely invest without needing government intervention. By utilizing public funds and imposing fees, the RMA may reduce market-driven solutions and create a subsidized competitor to private enterprise.
The bill authorizes the RMA to impose vehicle registration fees within Maverick County, contingent on voter approval. However, this still places a financial burden on residents, many of whom may not directly benefit from the specific transportation projects funded. Taxpayers would effectively be subsidizing a service that primarily benefits a minority of the population, raising equity concerns. The lack of clear cost-benefit analysis and transparency regarding project funding and fee structures further complicates the justification for such a financial commitment.
The bill does not include adequate safeguards to ensure the RMA's financial accountability and transparency. The board of directors would largely be appointed rather than elected, which may reduce public influence over decisions affecting fee structures and project priorities. Additionally, the initial exemption from Transportation Commission approval reduces checks and balances, allowing local officials to establish an authority without broader state scrutiny.
Given the expansion of government authority, potential suppression of private sector solutions, and financial impacts on residents, HB 3332 raises concerns that outweigh the potential benefits. To maintain limited government, protect free enterprise, and ensure fiscal responsibility, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote NO on HB 3332.