HB 3388 amends the Texas Insurance Code to expand and modernize regulations governing group property and casualty insurance policies. The bill clarifies definitions related to “large risk” and introduces the term “member” to describe individuals or entities with an insurable interest under a group policy. It mandates greater transparency during the insurance application and renewal processes by requiring insurers to disclose whether a shared aggregate limit applies to the policy and to provide members with both the policy and a certificate of insurance.
The bill also permits policies issued under this framework to include incidental casualty and liability coverage, enhancing the practicality of group insurance products. It brings surplus lines insurers under most of the chapter’s provisions but allows them to meet certain obligations—such as demonstrating the unavailability of similar coverage in the admitted market—on a group-wide, rather than per-member, basis. Additionally, it streamlines surplus lines reporting by requiring only the group policy to be filed, not individual certificates.
A new chapter (2172) is created to authorize insurers to issue group personal lines property and casualty policies to “permitted groups,” defined as groups of ten or more certificate holders with a preexisting non-insurance relationship (e.g., association or trade affiliation). To ensure fairness, these group policies must offer reasonable premiums in relation to benefits, must not use shared aggregate limits, and must prevent one member’s claims from negatively affecting another's coverage. This framework is intended to provide economies of scale while preserving consumer protections. The Texas Department of Insurance is authorized to adopt rules to implement these provisions.
The originally filed version of HB 3388 and the Committee Substitute share the same core objective—expanding access to group property and casualty insurance while imposing consumer protection measures—but there are notable differences in structure, scope, and specific provisions between the two.
One major difference is the refinement of language and regulatory clarity in the committee substitute. For example, in the original version, Chapter 2172 applies to “insureds” in a group, while the substitute clarifies this as “certificate holders” and specifies that each certificate is to be treated as if it were a standalone insurance policy for purposes of applying regulatory protections. This change ensures more precise compliance with existing insurance statutes and strengthens consumer protections by codifying individual treatment within group frameworks.
Another key change in the substitute bill is the enhanced handling of surplus lines insurance. While the original version simply exempted surplus lines insurers from certain sections and imposed a general rule to follow Chapter 2172 (with few filing obligations), the substitute version further specifies reporting procedures, easing compliance burdens by requiring only a single group policy to be filed rather than filings for each certificate. It also adjusts the "diligent effort" requirement to be applied on an annual basis rather than per-member, streamlining operations for surplus lines agents.
Additionally, the substitute introduces more structured disclosure requirements. While both versions mandate disclosure of shared aggregate limits, the committee substitute explicitly requires insurers to provide both the certificate of insurance and the full policy document to each group member within 30 days of issuance or renewal—adding procedural detail and enforceability to the originally broad requirement.
Overall, HB 3388 refines and expands upon the originally filed bill by tightening definitions, adding procedural clarity, improving consumer protections, and providing regulatory relief for surplus lines carriers without weakening oversight. These enhancements likely reflect stakeholder feedback and legislative intent to balance market flexibility with policyholder transparency.