HB 3809

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
positive
Free Enterprise
positive
Property Rights
positive
Personal Responsibility
positive
Limited Government
positive
Individual Liberty
Digest

HB 3809 seeks to regulate the decommissioning and removal of battery energy storage facilities in Texas. The bill adds Chapter 303 to the Texas Utilities Code, creating a legal framework to ensure that private land leased for battery storage purposes is properly restored once the facility ceases operations. Under the bill, a "battery energy storage facility agreement" must explicitly require the operator (the "grantee") to remove all facility components—including batteries, transformers, substations, buried cables, and overhead lines—from the property. Foundations and buried materials must be cleared to at least three feet below the surface, and any resulting cavities must be backfilled with soil similar to the native land.

HB 3809 also requires that recyclable materials from decommissioned facilities must be reused or properly recycled where feasible, while non-recyclable hazardous materials must be disposed of according to federal and state laws. Landowners are given the right to request financial assurance, such as a bond or insurance, to ensure that operators will fulfill these obligations at the end of the facility’s operational life. Moreover, the bill invalidates any contract provision that seeks to waive or limit the operator’s removal responsibilities under this law, and it gives harmed landowners the right to seek injunctive relief to enforce the removal requirements.

Importantly, HB 3809 harmonizes with existing laws governing the decommissioning of wind and solar facilities by applying similar cleanup and recycling standards to battery storage projects, especially where they are co-located with renewable generation facilities. The bill emphasizes contract enforcement rather than government regulation, respecting private agreements while protecting landowners from being burdened with cleanup costs. In doing so, HB 3809 promotes responsible energy development and preservation of Texas’s private lands.

Author (3)
Drew Darby
Stan Gerdes
Rafael Anchia
Co-Author (11)
Sponsor (1)
Charles Schwertner
Co-Sponsor (1)
Cesar Blanco
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), any administrative costs associated with implementing the bill, such as ensuring that battery energy storage facility agreements include the newly mandated removal and recycling provisions, can be absorbed within existing agency resources. No additional appropriations or staffing increases are expected to be necessary.

Similarly, the bill is expected to have no significant fiscal impact on local governments. Since the legislation primarily governs private contracts between landowners and battery storage operators, and enforcement remains through civil remedies rather than public regulatory mechanisms, counties and municipalities are not anticipated to incur new responsibilities or costs.

Overall, HB 3809 has been evaluated as a low-cost measure that enhances protections for landowners without imposing financial burdens on taxpayers or government agencies.

Vote Recommendation Notes

HB 3809 addresses the rapid expansion of battery energy storage systems (BESS) in Texas by establishing a smart, limited framework for the decommissioning and land restoration of battery facilities. As the industry continues to grow, with over 10,000 megawatts in operation by late 2024, the bill provides critical protection for landowners without resorting to expanded government control. HB 3809 ensures that operators, not landowners or taxpayers, bear the costs of facility removal, environmental cleanup, and land restoration through contractual requirements.

Importantly, HB 3809 does not grow the size or scope of government. It imposes no new agencies, rulemaking, or state enforcement bureaucracy. The bill relies on private contracts and civil remedies, respecting the principle of limited government. It also does not increase the burden on taxpayers; fiscal analysis confirms no significant cost to state or local governments, and no new taxes or fees. The regulatory burden on businesses is minimal and narrowly tailored: only battery storage facility operators are required to provide for environmental cleanup, recycling, and financial assurances—all directly related to their voluntary use of private land.

By promoting personal responsibility, protecting private property rights, encouraging responsible energy development, and ensuring that private contracts, not government, drive compliance, HB 3809 aligns strongly with core liberty principles. It offers a smart, balanced approach that respects free enterprise while safeguarding Texas landowners and communities. As such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 3809.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill protects landowners’ rights to their property by ensuring that companies cannot leave behind abandoned, contaminated land. It empowers individuals to demand cleanup through their lease agreements, safeguarding their control over their own property.
  • Personal Responsibility: The bill requires companies to take full responsibility for the long-term consequences of their energy projects. They must plan ahead (financially and operationally) to clean up after themselves, not push that burden onto landowners or future generations.
  • Free Enterprise: The bill allows the battery storage industry to continue to grow and innovate but ensures that companies respect the private property they use. It does not add broad new regulations; it simply says if a business wants to use someone's land, they must fix it afterward.
  • Private Property Rights: Landowners are protected from having their property devalued or ruined by leftover infrastructure. They are given the legal tools (through contract requirements and financial assurances) to ensure their land is restored to usable condition.
  • Limited Government: The bill does not create new government offices, regulations, or taxes. Enforcement stays between the landowner and the company through private contracts and civil courts. The government’s role remains minimal — it simply ensures landowners have the right to demand proper cleanup.
Related Legislation
View Bill Text and Status