HB 4753

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
positive
Free Enterprise
positive
Property Rights
neutral
Personal Responsibility
positive
Limited Government
positive
Individual Liberty
Digest
HB 4753 amends Subchapter Z, Chapter 214 of the Texas Local Government Code to require municipalities to provide a document verifying the issuance of an original certificate of occupancy (CO) upon request by the building owner, provided the municipality has a record of the original CO. This document serves as formal confirmation that the building met all applicable municipal requirements at the time of issuance.

The bill further prohibits municipalities from enacting or enforcing any ordinance or regulation that compels a building owner, who has obtained this verifying document, to retrieve or display the original certificate of occupancy. Additionally, it explicitly allows the verifying document to be displayed in place of the original CO for any applicable purposes, such as inspection, leasing, or sale.

This measure aims to reduce unnecessary administrative burdens for property owners and streamlines the process of occupancy verification, especially in instances where the original CO may have been lost or is difficult to locate. The bill reflects a broader intent to standardize municipal practices and ensure that access to official records does not become a barrier to property use or business operation.

The originally filed version of HB 4753 and the Committee Substitute version are substantively similar in intent but differ in structure, language clarity, and precision of municipal obligations.

In the originally filed bill, the language is more general and refers to a municipality providing a “document acknowledging” that a certificate of occupancy (CO) has been issued, if the municipality has a record of doing so. It states that a municipality may not require a person who receives such a document to obtain or display the original CO and must consider the provided document sufficient for display in its place.

The Committee Substitute refines and clarifies this language. It uses the more precise phrasing “issue a document to the owner...verifying that the municipality has issued an original certificate of occupancy,” enhancing both specificity and legal clarity. The substitute version also uses more direct legislative commands such as “shall issue” and “must allow,” strengthening the mandates placed on municipalities. Structurally, it maintains the same three-part provision layout but tightens the language to remove ambiguity, making it easier to interpret and enforce.

Overall, the Committee Substitute version of HB 4753 improves upon the original by enhancing statutory clarity, standardizing terminology (e.g., "verifying document" vs "acknowledging document"), and using more directive legislative language to reduce municipal discretion in implementing the bill’s provisions. These changes reflect careful legislative drafting refinements but retain the bill’s core intent: to ensure that building owners can rely on municipal records in place of an original certificate of occupancy.
Author (5)
Gary Gates
Carl Tepper
Suleman Lalani
Mark Dorazio
Keith Bell
Co-Author (14)
Sponsor (1)
Tan Parker
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), HB 4753 is not expected to have any fiscal implications for the state of Texas. This suggests that the responsibilities imposed by the bill—namely, providing a verifying document for previously issued certificates of occupancy—can be implemented within the existing administrative frameworks of municipalities and do not require new funding or staffing at the state level.

At the local level, the bill also carries no significant fiscal implications for municipalities. Cities are already responsible for issuing and maintaining records of certificates of occupancy, and this bill simply requires them to produce a verifying document upon request when such a record exists. The associated costs are likely to be minimal and easily absorbed into existing municipal permitting or code enforcement budgets. For most cities, especially those with digitized recordkeeping systems, this task would involve little more than a clerical operation.

In essence, HB 4753 formalizes and standardizes an administrative function that many municipalities already perform informally or inconsistently. The bill’s language avoids imposing new infrastructure or enforcement mandates, helping to ensure that local governments are not burdened with additional financial or logistical strain. As a result, the fiscal footprint of this legislation is negligible.

Vote Recommendation Notes

Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 4753 based on its alignment with core liberty principles, its clarification of municipal obligations, and its elimination of unnecessary regulatory burdens. The bill addresses a situation where property owners were required to reapply—and pay again—for a certificate of occupancy (CO) that had already been issued and recorded by the city. This practice imposed an unjust administrative and financial burden. HB 4753 resolves the issue by requiring municipalities to issue a verifying document when requested by a property owner, provided the city has a record of the original CO.

Importantly, the bill does not grow the size or scope of government. Instead, it places limits on municipal regulatory authority by preventing cities from requiring the display or reissuance of an original CO when a verifying document is available. This ensures that local governments cannot duplicate bureaucratic processes or collect redundant fees, thereby reinforcing principles of limited government and private property rights.

The bill also imposes no new fiscal burdens on taxpayers. The Legislative Budget Board confirms that there are no significant fiscal implications for either the state or local governments. Administrative tasks required under the bill are minimal and fall within the scope of standard municipal operations, meaning implementation can occur without new staff, funding, or systems.

Lastly, HB 4753 reduces the regulatory burden on individuals and businesses. It streamlines compliance by allowing owners to display a verifying document in place of the original CO and ensures municipalities cannot enforce rules that demand more than what is reasonable and already recorded. By resolving a clear administrative inefficiency, the bill supports free enterprise and simplifies the responsibilities of property owners without imposing new mandates or costs.

Overall, HB 4753 is a measured and constructive policy that enhances transparency, safeguards individual rights, and enforces practical limits on local governmental authority—all without expanding bureaucracy or increasing taxpayer obligations.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill protects individual liberty by giving property owners the right to request and receive a document confirming their building's certificate of occupancy without being forced to reapply or pay again. This respects citizens’ autonomy and ensures they are not penalized for bureaucratic inefficiencies.
  • Personal Responsibility: The bill does not shift responsibilities away from property owners; rather, it allows them to fulfill their obligations (such as displaying proof of occupancy) in a more practical way. It encourages owners to maintain good records while giving them a backup option when the original document is unavailable.
  • Free Enterprise: By removing unnecessary administrative delays and fees, the bill supports business operations, especially for landlords, developers, or small business owners needing proof of occupancy for leasing or sales. It removes a potential barrier to commerce, aligning with a freer and more efficient marketplace.
  • Private Property Rights: The bill reinforces the right of property owners to use and manage their property without undue government obstruction. It ensures municipalities cannot withhold a basic verification that should already be accessible, affirming the owner’s right to use and benefit from their property.
  • Limited Government: The bill directly limits municipal authority by prohibiting cities from enforcing rules that would force property owners to obtain or display an original certificate if a verifying document is available. It reduces local government overreach and adds a check on unnecessary regulation.
View Bill Text and Status