HB 519

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
positive
Free Enterprise
positive
Property Rights
positive
Personal Responsibility
positive
Limited Government
positive
Individual Liberty
Digest
HB 519 modernizes and simplifies the regulation of honey and honeycomb production in Texas by amending several provisions of the Texas Health and Safety Code. The bill removes the term “small” from the definition of “honey production operation,” effectively eliminating the previous cap that limited producers to under 2,500 pounds of annual honey output. This change broadens eligibility for regulatory exemptions, allowing more beekeepers to operate without being classified as food manufacturers or food service establishments.

The bill also clarifies that a beekeeper extracting and packaging honey or cut honeycomb is engaging in the handling of a raw agricultural commodity, rather than manufacturing. This legal distinction exempts these operations from additional manufacturing regulations and recognizes honey harvesting as a legitimate form of agricultural production under state law.

Additionally, HB 519 prohibits local governments, including municipal health departments, from regulating the production or sale of honey or honeycomb by these producers. This centralizes regulatory authority at the state level and minimizes potential burdens on small-scale and home-based producers. The bill retains labeling requirements in accordance with the Agriculture Code but eliminates redundant language previously mandating specific label disclosures.

Taken together, these revisions aim to reduce regulatory complexity, promote rural and home-based entrepreneurship, and affirm the agricultural nature of honey production in Texas.
Author (1)
Mary Gonzalez
Co-Author (1)
Maria Flores
Sponsor (1)
Lois Kolkhorst
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), HB 519 is expected to have no fiscal impact on the State of Texas. The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS), the agency with relevant jurisdiction, indicated that the implementation of this legislation would not require additional resources or result in any measurable cost to the state budget.

Additionally, the bill is not anticipated to impose any fiscal burden on local governments. While HB 519 restricts local governments from regulating honey production operations, the fiscal note concludes that this limitation would not result in a financial loss or mandate for counties, municipalities, or local health departments.

Overall, HB 519 is projected to be fiscally neutral. It adjusts regulatory authority and definitions but does not create new enforcement duties, revenue streams, or funding needs for state or local entities.

Vote Recommendation Notes

HB 519 amends state law to better align with federal standards by classifying honey extraction and packaging as handling of a “raw agricultural commodity.” In doing so, it eliminates outdated regulatory definitions and constraints on honey producers, especially small-scale and independent operators, who previously faced licensing requirements that were inconsistent with FDA guidelines.

Crucially, HB 519 does not grow the size or scope of government, does not increase the burden on taxpayers, and does not expand the regulatory burden. Instead, it scales back existing regulations by removing licensing mandates, repealing restrictive labeling rules, and expressly prohibiting local government regulation of honey production operations. These changes reduce administrative oversight by both state and local entities, resulting in no fiscal impact to the state or local governments, as confirmed by the Legislative Budget Board.

By treating honey operations more like other agricultural activities, the bill supports the rights of Texans to utilize their property for productive purposes and to operate freely in the market without undue interference. It promotes economic opportunity, reduces compliance burdens, and clarifies statutory definitions in a way that empowers both rural and urban beekeepers. Overall, HB 519 reduces regulatory complexity, limits government overreach, and preserves personal and economic freedoms. As such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 519.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill expands individual freedom by allowing beekeepers to produce and sell honey without having to get a license from the Department of State Health Services (DSHS) or be treated as a food service establishment. It removes limitations on where and how they can sell honey and reaffirms their right to operate without unnecessary state interference. This empowers individuals to pursue small-scale agriculture or cottage industry ventures more freely.
  • Personal Responsibility: By removing burdensome regulatory oversight, the bill places more responsibility on producers to ensure the quality and safety of their honey and on consumers to make informed choices. It assumes individuals are capable of acting in their own best interest without the state dictating how honey must be packaged or labeled, which reinforces the principle that freedom and responsibility go hand in hand.
  • Free Enterprise: The bill enhances economic freedom by removing production limits (previously under 2,500 lbs/year), allowing broader sales and distribution options, and eliminating unnecessary licensing barriers. This makes it easier for small businesses and startups to enter the market and compete, supporting an open and fair marketplace without government favoritism.
  • Private Property Rights: The bill respects property rights by recognizing honey production as a raw agricultural activity, not a processed/manufactured good. This reclassification lets producers use their land and labor with fewer regulatory hurdles and reduces the risk of local governments imposing zoning or health restrictions that could limit how landowners use their property.
  • Limited Government: The bill reduces government reach by removing licensing requirements for beekeepers, eliminating local government authority to regulate honey production, and stripping unnecessary labeling mandates. It ensures that producers are not subject to overlapping and inconsistent regulations from local and state agencies, which reinforces the idea that government should stay within its proper, limited role.
View Bill Text and Status