89th Legislature

SB 1333

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
Free Enterprise
Property Rights
Personal Responsibility
Limited Government
Individual Liberty
Digest

SB 1333 addresses issues surrounding unauthorized occupation, fraudulent conveyance, and illegal advertisement or leasing of residential real property in Texas. The bill introduces new criminal offenses and strengthens penalties to protect property owners from deceptive practices and unlawful intrusions. This legislation reflects a broad concern about the rise of squatting and property fraud.

One of the primary changes made by SB 1333 is the amendment of Section 28.03 of the Texas Penal Code, which deals with criminal mischief. The bill enhances criminal penalties for damage or interference involving residences, public infrastructure, or agricultural properties, including specific provisions for tampering with public utilities and catalytic converters. These updates aim to reinforce legal consequences in cases where property damage is tied to unauthorized occupation or broader schemes affecting property rights and community safety.

Additionally, SB 1333 introduces two new offenses in Chapter 32 of the Penal Code. Section 32.56 makes it a Class A misdemeanor to knowingly present false or fraudulent documents—such as a fake lease or deed—intended to claim real property. Section 32.57 creates a first-degree felony offense for knowingly selling, renting, or advertising residential property without having legal title or authority to do so. These provisions are designed to deter fraudulent real estate activity, particularly targeting bad actors who exploit vulnerable renters or attempt to illegitimately occupy or convey property.

Through these statutory updates and new offenses, SB 1333 strengthens the legal tools available to property owners and law enforcement, enabling faster resolution of squatting situations and deterring the spread of property-related fraud in Texas.

The Committee Substitute for SB 1333 significantly streamlines and refocuses the originally filed version, retaining the core intent of combating unauthorized occupation and fraudulent conveyance of residential property, but shifting away from creating a detailed new civil process toward a stronger reliance on the criminal justice system.

In the originally filed version, SB 1333 introduced an extensive civil procedure under a new Chapter 24B of the Property Code, which allowed property owners to file a sworn complaint with the sheriff to have unauthorized occupants removed without going through a traditional eviction process. This section included a formal affidavit process, criteria for removal, a liability shield for sheriffs, and a remedy for wrongful removal. However, in the Committee Substitute, this entire civil enforcement structure appears to have been removed or heavily revised. This suggests a deliberate move to avoid legal complexities or constitutional challenges related to due process, particularly in handling disputed occupancy claims without judicial oversight.

Instead, the Committee Substitute places greater emphasis on the criminal aspects of the issue. It retains and sharpens the new criminal offenses added to Chapter 32 of the Penal Code—namely, presenting fraudulent real estate documents and engaging in unauthorized sales or leases of residential property. These offenses remain largely intact from the original version but are refined to ensure consistency with other fraud statutes and provide clearer prosecutorial guidance. The substitute also continues the proposed enhancements to Section 28.03 of the Penal Code, which raise penalties for certain types of property damage, especially those involving habitation, public infrastructure, or catalytic converters.

Overall, the substitute represents a more targeted and arguably more enforceable version of the bill. By removing the procedural burden from law enforcement and courts under a new civil framework and instead strengthening penalties and criminal definitions, the bill's revised form seeks to achieve the same protective goals for property owners while minimizing legal and practical obstacles to implementation.

Author
Bryan Hughes
Co-Author
Lois Kolkhorst
Borris Miles
Kevin Sparks
Sponsor
Jeff Leach
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), the fiscal implications of SB 1333 are currently indeterminate due to insufficient data on how often the newly defined offenses—such as fraudulent leasing or unlawful occupancy—occur under the bill’s specified circumstances. While the legislation introduces new criminal offenses and enhances penalties for certain acts related to property fraud and unauthorized habitation, there’s no reliable estimate of the number of prosecutions or civil removals that might result.

Creating new Class A misdemeanor and first-degree felony offenses may lead to a rise in criminal prosecutions, which could increase demands on both state and local correctional systems. This includes the potential for more individuals being supervised in the community or incarcerated. The bill's expansion of the criminal mischief statute also increases exposure to felony penalties for certain actions tied to trespassing and property damage, further complicating fiscal projections.

Additionally, the bill allows sheriffs and constables to collect fees from property owners or their agents when responding to complaints and executing removals of unauthorized occupants. These fees, including for presence during lock changes or property removal, would be retained at the local level and could offset some enforcement costs. However, the exact fiscal benefit from these fees remains unclear.

State agencies, such as the Office of Court Administration and the Comptroller of Public Accounts, noted that while more criminal cases may generate increased court costs and revenue, the extent of such increases is speculative at this time. Overall, the bill has the potential to impact state and local budgets—especially in terms of criminal justice workload—but without sufficient historical or predictive data, the precise fiscal impact cannot be determined.

Vote Recommendation Notes

SB 1333 represents a balanced and constitutionally grounded effort to empower property owners against squatting and real estate fraud while preserving legal safeguards for due process. The bill achieves this by enhancing criminal penalties for fraudulent conveyance of property and unauthorized occupancy and creating a streamlined but regulated process for law enforcement to assist in the removal of certain unauthorized occupants from residential dwellings.

The author’s intent is to fill a legal enforcement gap where property owners often face long, expensive, and ineffective civil proceedings when confronting squatters who may fabricate documents or claim false tenancy. Traditional eviction processes, rooted in landlord-tenant law, are not well suited to address bad-faith actors who have no legal right to occupy a property. SB 1333 offers law enforcement a clear framework to verify ownership and occupancy status, and, when appropriate, to act swiftly to restore property to its rightful owner—without undermining legitimate tenant protections.

Crucially, the bill includes new criminal offenses targeting individuals who knowingly use false documents to claim property or sell/rent it without authority, reinforcing private property rights and deterring real estate fraud. It also amends the Penal Code to increase penalties for criminal mischief when property damage is related to unauthorized habitation. While the fiscal note finds the budgetary impact indeterminate due to uncertain enforcement volume, the bill includes provisions for sheriffs and constables to recoup service-related fees, potentially offsetting local enforcement costs.

In light of its alignment with liberty principles—especially private property rights, personal responsibility, and limited government—Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on SB 1333. It addresses an emerging real-world issue with appropriate legal tools while protecting against abuse through clearly defined verification steps and legal recourse in the event of wrongful removal.

  • Individual Liberty: By clarifying the legal protections for rightful property owners and establishing a process for peaceful removal of bad-faith occupiers, the bill strengthens the liberty of individuals to feel secure in their homes and to manage their property without unlawful interference. At the same time, it preserves civil protections for legitimate tenants and family members, ensuring that lawful occupants are not unjustly targeted.
  • Personal Responsibility: The bill imposes clear criminal penalties for presenting false property documents and for fraudulently selling or leasing property. This reinforces the notion that individuals must be accountable for their actions—especially when those actions are intended to deceive others or subvert rightful ownership. The law helps disincentivize bad behavior by placing tangible consequences on those who manipulate legal gray areas to occupy or profit from property that isn’t theirs.
  • Free Enterprise: While not a commercial regulation per se, the bill supports the integrity of real estate markets by addressing fraudulent activity that undermines trust in property transactions. Protecting lawful title and leaseholders from fraud helps create a more predictable and reliable environment for property owners, buyers, renters, and investors.
  • Private Property Rights: The bill reinforces the foundational right of individuals to control access to and use of their private property. By allowing law enforcement to remove unauthorized occupants—when there is no valid lease, family relationship, or pending litigation—the legislation empowers property owners to reclaim what is rightfully theirs. It targets bad-faith actors who exploit legal ambiguity and fake documentation to gain or maintain control over property. This directly protects property owners from squatting and fraudulent property claims, which are severe violations of ownership rights.
  • Limited Government: The bill offers a more efficient alternative to lengthy civil eviction processes, reducing the dependency on judicial resources in clear-cut cases of unlawful occupation. By doing so, it supports a limited government approach—minimizing bureaucracy and expediting resolution without expanding administrative oversight. However, it does grant law enforcement new responsibilities, which could be seen as a mild expansion of executive enforcement authority. Nonetheless, this authority is well-circumscribed by procedural safeguards, such as owner verification and legal recourse for wrongful removals.
View Bill Text and Status