SB 1640 seeks to amend Section 411.1143 of the Texas Government Code to enhance the authority of the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) and its Office of Inspector General in conducting criminal history background checks on individuals and entities involved in Medicaid and other public benefits programs. The bill expands the scope of individuals subject to background checks to include provider applicants, managing employees, and individuals with at least a five percent ownership interest or significant financial ties to a provider or applicant.
Specifically, the legislation updates the language to reflect a broader application of criminal background checks, replacing older, narrower references to “medical assistance” programs with “public benefits programs.” It also clearly defines key terms such as “managing employee” and “ownership interest,” and includes provisions for assessing individuals who may indirectly control provider operations or have financial leverage through instruments like mortgages or promissory notes.
By amending the law in this way, SB 1640 seeks to strengthen program integrity and protect recipients of state-administered benefits by ensuring that those with financial or operational control over healthcare providers have not engaged in criminal conduct that could jeopardize program quality or public trust. The bill is designed to align Texas practices with federal expectations for fraud prevention in public assistance programs.
The originally filed version of SB 1640 focused exclusively on the Medicaid program and amended Section 411.1143 of the Government Code to clarify and expand the Health and Human Services Commission's (HHSC) authority to access criminal history record information for individuals and entities seeking to provide services under Medicaid. It specifically defined the types of individuals subject to background checks, including managing employees, officers, directors, partners, and those with ownership or financial interests of 5% or more. The definitions of “provider,” “ownership interest,” and “managing employee” were tailored specifically to the Medicaid context. It also introduced a definition of “Medicaid agency” as the single state agency administering the state Medicaid plan.
In contrast, the Committee Substitute broadens the bill’s scope significantly beyond Medicaid to include all public benefits programs administered by HHSC. This version modifies the statutory language by removing references specific to the “medical assistance” or “Medicaid” program and replacing them with “public benefits programs,” thereby allowing the same criminal history access provisions to apply more broadly. It also adjusts the heading of the statute and rewords sections to accommodate this expanded scope. The substitution removes the specific definition of “Medicaid agency” present in the filed version and instead emphasizes HHSC’s authority over a range of benefit programs.
Furthermore, the Committee Substitute includes language updates to align more closely with the operational and regulatory terminology used across multiple benefit programs. This not only allows for a more unified approach to screening providers across HHSC programs but also indicates a legislative intent to prevent fraud and abuse more comprehensively, not just in Medicaid but across all taxpayer-funded services.
In summary, the key distinction lies in scope: the originally filed bill focused only on Medicaid, while the substitute version expands the oversight authority to all public benefits programs, thereby reinforcing HHSC’s role in ensuring integrity across its broader range of services.
Contact the Author
Sen. Brent Hagenbuch
