89th Legislature Regular Session

SB 1760

Overall Vote Recommendation
Vote Yes; Amend
Principle Criteria
Free Enterprise
Property Rights
Personal Responsibility
Limited Government
Individual Liberty
Digest

SB 1760 proposes updates to the Texas Estates Code, specifically Chapter 1023, to improve and modernize the procedures for transferring guardianship cases between counties. The bill clarifies that if a guardianship is initiated in a court without proper venue, it must be transferred to the correct jurisdiction upon the application of any interested party. It also updates the notification requirement for sureties on guardian bonds, allowing for service by a "qualified delivery method" instead of requiring personal service, thus providing flexibility and potentially reducing costs.

A key feature of the bill is its shift toward electronic documentation and standardization. It mandates that clerks use the electronic filing system authorized under Section 72.031 of the Government Code to transfer case records, including transfer certificates, orders, pleadings, and cost bills. The Office of Court Administration is tasked with developing standardized forms to ensure uniformity. Additionally, the bill prescribes that both the transferring and receiving clerks retain copies of all records and may reproduce certified copies for legal purposes, provided they include the relevant transfer certificate.

SB 1760 also establishes a flat $45 fee for the receiving county clerk to file a transferred guardianship case, with an explicit prohibition on assessing any other filing fees for that transfer. This change is designed to reduce administrative and financial burdens on parties involved in the guardianship process. If passed, these updates will create a more consistent, efficient, and cost-effective process for transferring guardianship cases across Texas counties.

Author
Judith Zaffirini
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), SB 1760 is not expected to result in any significant fiscal impact to the State of Texas. The bill's provisions—centered around the modernization and standardization of guardianship case transfers—are anticipated to be implementable within existing budgetary resources of the involved state entities, particularly the Office of Court Administration and the Texas Judicial Council.

At the local level, the bill is likewise projected to have no significant fiscal implications. While the legislation introduces a flat $45 filing fee for the clerk in the county receiving a transferred guardianship case and prohibits additional filing fees for that transfer, these changes are not expected to materially affect the budgets of county governments. The fixed fee may improve predictability in revenue collection related to guardianship transfers and reduce administrative complexity, but it does not represent a major source of income or expense.

Overall, SB 1760 appears fiscally neutral. It facilitates administrative efficiency and procedural clarity in the court system without requiring new appropriations or imposing burdensome costs on state or local governments.

Vote Recommendation Notes

SB 1760 addresses long-standing procedural inefficiencies in the transfer of guardianship cases across county courts in Texas. It modernizes and standardizes the process by mandating the use of electronic filing systems for document transfers, establishing uniform clerk responsibilities, and capping the transfer filing fee at $45. These reforms respond to confusion and administrative inconsistencies that have previously resulted in delays, excessive re-filing charges, and, in some cases, the premature closure of guardianship matters.

The bill advances key liberty principles by streamlining government operations and reducing unnecessary burdens on guardians and families. It improves transparency and efficiency without expanding the scope of judicial power. By limiting the fees clerks can charge and ensuring that guardianship proceedings are properly concluded, the bill also protects individuals under guardianship from procedural gaps that might otherwise affect their care or legal standing.

While SB 1760 is directionally sound and Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES, several amendments are recommended to improve its clarity, accountability, and implementation. These suggested amendments ensure the bill not only accomplishes its stated goals but does so with full regard to limited government and individual rights.

Recommended Amendments to Strengthen SB 1760:

  • Clarify Dispute Resolution Procedures: Add language specifying how disputes over the application or enforcement of the $45 transfer fee are to be handled, including a clear appeals or complaint process for parties who believe they were overcharged.
  • Statewide Compliance Reporting: Require the Office of Court Administration to track and report on county compliance with the standardized transfer procedures, including fee adherence and use of the electronic filing system.
  • Clerk Training Provisions: Include language directing the Office of Court Administration to develop and disseminate training materials for county clerks to ensure consistent application of the new transfer procedures.
  • Affidavit Requirement for Fee Collection: Require clerks collecting the $45 fee to file an affidavit certifying that no additional fees were collected in connection with the transfer, ensuring transparency and accountability.
  • Include Protections for Low-Income Guardians: Consider including a fee waiver mechanism for indigent guardians, consistent with existing provisions in other areas of probate and guardianship law.

With these adjustments, SB 1760 will better fulfill its goal of creating an equitable and efficient guardianship transfer process while reinforcing principles of limited government and procedural fairness.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill protects individual liberty by ensuring that incapacitated persons under guardianship—and their guardians—are not subjected to excessive bureaucratic burdens or inconsistent court procedures. By standardizing the guardianship transfer process and capping fees, the bill reduces confusion, delay, and financial hardship, especially for vulnerable individuals and families. Moreover, new requirements that courts ensure a guardianship is fully concluded before a guardian is discharged safeguard the continuity of care and due process rights for wards.
  • Personal Responsibility: The bill enhances personal responsibility by clarifying the obligations of guardians and requiring them to promptly notify the court of key events, such as changes in residence or the ward's hospitalization. These provisions ensure that guardians remain actively accountable to the court and reinforce their fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the person under guardianship.
  • Free Enterprise: The bill does not directly regulate or impact the private sector or commerce. However, by eliminating unpredictably high transfer fees and improving administrative efficiency in the court system, it may have an indirect benefit for attorneys, fiduciaries, and service providers who rely on a smooth and transparent guardianship process.
  • Private Property Rights: While not directly altering property rights, the bill helps secure the management of property held in guardianship by streamlining the legal oversight framework. Provisions requiring thorough documentation and final settlement processes help protect a ward’s estate from mismanagement or premature discharge of a guardian, which can safeguard their property interests.
  • Limited Government: The bill advances limited government by reducing arbitrary clerk practices, capping fees at $45, and mandating standardized procedures. It restrains local courts from imposing excessive or duplicative costs on citizens. However, to fully align with this principle, the bill should be amended to include transparency measures, compliance oversight, and procedural safeguards to prevent misuse of fee authority at the county level.

View Bill Text and Status