SB 1762 amends the Texas Natural Resources Code to enhance the Railroad Commission of Texas's authority in managing orphaned oil and gas wells, particularly with respect to emerging geothermal energy technologies. The bill redefines “geothermal energy conservation well” to more accurately distinguish it from battery energy storage resources. This updated definition clarifies that these wells are used to retain energy that may later be dispatched to the electrical grid, highlighting their role in enhancing energy reliability and grid stability.
The core provision of the bill authorizes the Railroad Commission to designate a person as the operator of an orphaned well if that person demonstrates a continuing possessory right to the well. Such a claim must be substantiated with recognized legal documentation, including current leases or deeds for the mineral estate, geothermal estate, or geologic space accessed by the well. To be considered, the applicant must also submit a completed certificate of compliance and pay a $250 nonrefundable fee.
By enabling qualified parties to take operational control of abandoned wells, the bill promotes responsible energy development and reduces the state’s burden in managing inactive wells. It also supports the integration of geothermal energy into Texas’s energy portfolio, positioning the state to utilize its subsurface resources more sustainably and innovatively. Overall, SB 1762 represents a regulatory refinement that facilitates private sector engagement in energy infrastructure management while ensuring legal and environmental safeguards are maintained.
The originally filed version of SB 1762 and its Committee Substitute version share the same core intent: to define geothermal energy conservation wells and authorize the Railroad Commission of Texas to designate an operator for certain orphaned wells. However, there are several noteworthy differences between the two versions that reflect legislative refinement and clarification of scope.
In the originally filed version, geothermal energy conservation wells are explicitly categorized as "electric energy storage facilities"—a term that links them more directly to the state’s broader energy storage regulatory framework. However, it also clarifies that such wells are not "battery energy storage resources." This distinction suggests an attempt to position geothermal wells within existing energy infrastructure classifications while still distinguishing them from batteries like lithium-ion systems.
In contrast, the Committee Substitute version simplifies and clarifies the definition. It removes the designation of geothermal wells as electric energy storage facilities, instead focusing solely on their use for "retention of energy" for dispatchable electricity generation. This change avoids potential regulatory overlap and narrows the definition in a way that better fits the unique characteristics of geothermal storage technologies.
Additionally, while the substantive requirements in Section 89.047(f) remain largely the same in both versions—requiring proof of legal interest, a compliance certificate, and a $250 fee—the committee substitute version includes minor but important editorial refinements. These include formatting changes, bracketed edits to clarify that the term “energy conservation well” refers specifically to geothermal applications, and cleaner language throughout.
Overall, the committee substitute version tightens the bill’s focus on geothermal-specific regulation and simplifies legal language, likely in response to stakeholder feedback or committee analysis aimed at aligning the statute more cleanly with existing regulatory frameworks and energy infrastructure goals.