SB 1862

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
neutral
Free Enterprise
neutral
Property Rights
positive
Personal Responsibility
positive
Limited Government
positive
Individual Liberty
Digest

SB 1862 addresses the handling of voter registration applications from individuals who are relocating to Texas from out of state. Specifically, the bill enhances interjurisdictional communication by requiring voter registrars in Texas to collect and report certain information when an applicant for voter registration indicates their prior residence was outside of Texas.

Under this bill, voter registrars must document the applicant’s full legal name, date of birth, current Texas residential address, and previous out-of-state address. Additionally, they must collect identifiers such as the applicant’s Social Security number and Texas driver’s license or personal ID number, when available. This information must be compiled and transmitted monthly to the Texas Secretary of State.

The Secretary of State, in turn, is required to notify the voter registrar in the applicant’s previous state of residence that the individual has registered to vote in Texas. The purpose of this notification is to facilitate the removal of the voter from the previous state's voter rolls, helping prevent potential dual registration across state lines.

SB 1862 aims to bolster election integrity by improving coordination between states in maintaining accurate and up-to-date voter registration records. The bill is scheduled to take effect on September 1, 2025.

The original version of SB 1862, as introduced by Senator Hughes, and the committee substitute share the same central goal: improving voter roll accuracy by notifying out-of-state election officials when a voter registers in Texas. However, there are key differences in who initiates the notification, data flow structure, and administrative responsibility that distinguish the two versions.

In the original bill, the local voter registrar in Texas is directly responsible for sending notifications to the voter registrar in the applicant’s previous state of residence when the applicant indicates that they previously lived outside Texas. This process is decentralized, relying on individual Texas counties to initiate cross-state communication. The bill also requires those local registrars to report to the Texas Secretary of State on a monthly basis with a list of all notifications sent, including personal identifiers such as the applicant’s name, date of birth, address, and voter ID data.

By contrast, the Committee Substitute centralizes the process by shifting the core responsibility for out-of-state notification from local voter registrars to the Texas Secretary of State. Under this version, local registrars compile the necessary data and submit it to the Secretary of State at least once per month. The Secretary of State then takes over the task of notifying the appropriate out-of-state jurisdiction. This structural change creates a more uniform, streamlined, and likely more secure data exchange process, reducing inconsistencies that might arise from each county conducting its own outreach.

Additionally, while both versions require similar sets of voter data to be collected, the substitute version adds clarity and rigor to the transmission requirements, such as mandating inclusion of the Social Security number and voter unique identifier, if available. It also establishes a more proactive role for the Secretary of State in interstate cooperation, reflecting a shift toward centralized election integrity mechanisms.

In summary, the original bill emphasizes decentralized, county-led notification, while the Committee Substitute prioritizes centralized, state-level coordination, which may enhance consistency, accountability, and data security in voter roll maintenance across state lines.

Author (1)
Bryan Hughes
Sponsor (1)
Hillary Hickland
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), SB 1862 would have no significant fiscal impact on the State of Texas. The proposed changes—centralizing and standardizing the reporting of out-of-state voter registrations and requiring the Secretary of State to notify other states—are expected to be implementable using the existing resources of the Secretary of State's office. This indicates that the administrative burden is not viewed as substantial enough to require additional funding, staffing, or infrastructure at the state level.

The bill's impact on local government, however, is less certain. The fiscal note states that the cost implications to voter registrars at the county level cannot be determined at this time. While registrars would be required to collect and transmit more detailed data on voter registration applications originating from out-of-state residents, the variability in local registrar capacity and system integration makes it difficult to assess the resource needs across Texas counties. Some local jurisdictions may be well equipped to absorb the requirements, while others—particularly smaller or less technologically advanced counties—may face logistical or administrative burdens.

Overall, the bill is designed to enhance interstate communication regarding voter registration status without triggering significant state-level expenditures. Nonetheless, the unquantified local impacts suggest that the Legislature may need to monitor implementation closely to ensure county voter registrars are able to comply efficiently and without undue hardship.

Vote Recommendation Notes

SB 1862 provides a targeted and reasonable policy solution to a known administrative gap in maintaining accurate voter registration rolls across state lines. The bill seeks to enhance the integrity of voter registration records by ensuring that when a person registers to vote in Texas and indicates a previous residence in another state, the Texas Secretary of State notifies the appropriate election authority in that former jurisdiction. This notification enables the previous state to remove the voter from its rolls, thereby helping to prevent potential double registration and maintain up-to-date voter lists nationally.

This legislation supports Limited Government by promoting administrative efficiency and intergovernmental cooperation without expanding regulatory powers or creating new enforcement burdens. It relies on existing state and local election infrastructure and limits rulemaking authority, making it a restrained approach to improving voter roll accuracy. It also respects Individual Liberty by allowing people to register and vote freely in their new state while ensuring their previous records are appropriately updated. Furthermore, it avoids the creation of criminal penalties or enforcement mechanisms, affirming that this is a procedural, not punitive, reform.

While the bill may impose some additional administrative responsibilities on local voter registrars, the requirement to compile and transmit the data monthly is within the normal scope of registrar duties. The fiscal note from the Legislative Budget Board confirms that there is no significant cost to the state and that local impact cannot yet be determined but is likely manageable with existing resources. Importantly, the bill does not mandate that voters themselves initiate deregistration from their prior state, helping ensure that the burden is not placed unfairly on individuals.

Given its narrow scope, minimal fiscal impact, and strong alignment with election integrity goals across the political spectrum, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on SB 1862.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill reinforces individual liberty by safeguarding the right to vote through enhanced voter roll accuracy. By ensuring that individuals are registered to vote in only one state at a time, it helps preserve the integrity of the electoral process while still allowing individuals to freely register in Texas upon moving. The bill does not restrict or complicate the ability to vote; instead, it protects the equal weight of every lawful vote, which is foundational to representative government.
  • Personal Responsibility: While the bill does not place new obligations directly on individual voters, it aligns with the principle of personal responsibility by assuming that individuals registering to vote in Texas will accurately report their previous address. The law then entrusts local and state officials with the procedural duty to ensure this information is appropriately used to help maintain clean and current voter rolls across jurisdictions.
  • Free Enterprise: The bill does not pertain to market activity, business regulation, or economic freedom, and therefore does not have a direct effect—positive or negative—on free enterprise. Its focus is on voter registration administration and interstate coordination, not commercial or economic liberties.
  • Private Property Rights: There is no impact on private property rights. The bill does not concern land use, ownership, or regulatory authority over private property and does not interfere with individuals’ ability to use, own, or control property.
  • Limited Government: SB 1862 promotes limited government by enhancing election system efficiency and intergovernmental coordination without expanding regulatory authority or creating new enforcement mechanisms. It keeps the implementation within the bounds of existing government structures—local registrars and the Secretary of State—without granting new powers or authorizing burdensome rules. By streamlining voter roll maintenance and placing responsibility with the appropriate administrative offices, the bill exemplifies a restrained and accountable approach to governance.
View Bill Text and Status