The fiscal implications of SB 213, as analyzed by the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), indicate that the bill would have no significant fiscal impact on the state government. The report assumes that any costs associated with implementing the bill could be absorbed using existing resources within the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI), meaning no additional state funding or staffing would be required.
Additionally, the bill is expected to have no fiscal impact on local governments. Since the legislation primarily affects private insurance companies and their policy offerings, it does not impose any new financial obligations or administrative burdens on municipalities, counties, or other local entities. The bill’s regulatory changes are limited to consumer protection and market practices, rather than imposing new taxes, fees, or expenditures.
Overall, SB 213 is fiscally neutral, ensuring consumer protections without generating additional costs for the state or local governments. This makes it a low-risk policy change from a budgetary standpoint.
SB 213 directly addresses anti-competitive insurance practices by making forced bundling of homeowners and auto insurance illegal. The bill was prompted by a 2024 incident in North Texas, where an insurance provider threatened to drop homeowners' coverage unless customers also purchased auto insurance from the same company. Since Texas law currently does not prohibit this practice, and a Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) rule addressing it could be rescinded by future regulators, SB 213 provides a permanent statutory solution​.
From a liberty principles perspective, the bill supports individual liberty by ensuring consumers are not coerced into purchasing unnecessary or unwanted insurance policies. It also protects private property rights, as homeowners and auto owners retain the freedom to choose insurance providers independently. While some might argue the bill introduces government intervention, it does not limit market competition but rather prevents coercive business practices, making it neutral on free enterprise.
Given these considerations, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on SB 213.