89th Legislature Regular Session

SB 2452

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
Free Enterprise
Property Rights
Personal Responsibility
Limited Government
Individual Liberty
Digest
SB 2452 seeks to amend Section 6.05(d) of the Texas Tax Code to restrict how chief appraisers within county appraisal districts are compensated. Specifically, the bill prohibits linking any portion of a chief appraiser’s compensation—either directly or indirectly—to increases in the market, appraised, or taxable value of property within the district. Under current law, while a chief appraiser’s salary is governed by the appraisal district board’s approved budget, there is no explicit statutory prohibition against performance-based compensation tied to property valuations. SB 2452 aims to close that gap to prevent conflicts of interest or incentives that could lead to inflated appraisals.

The bill reinforces the independence and objectivity required of appraisal offices by clarifying that salary decisions must be separated from outcomes that impact tax burdens. It ensures that chief appraisers are not rewarded for increasing property values, which would directly affect taxpayers. This separation intends to strengthen public trust in the fairness of the appraisal process and ensure consistency with constitutional protections against excessive taxation.

Additionally, SB 2452 retains the existing statutory exception in Section 6.0501 regarding the employment of a general counsel by the chief appraiser.

In essence, this legislation reflects a commitment to transparency, neutrality, and integrity in local property tax administration. By removing financial incentives for appraisers to push property valuations upward, SB 2452 supports a more balanced and equitable tax environment for Texas property owners.

The originally filed version of SB 2452 and the Committee Substitute both amend Section 6.05(d) of the Texas Tax Code, but the key difference lies in the presentation and emphasis of the revised language. In terms of substantive effect, both versions aim to prohibit a chief appraiser's compensation from being linked to increases in appraised property values; however, the Committee Substitute uses slightly clearer and more structured language to accomplish this goal.

In the originally filed version, the key clause is rendered as:

"No portion of the [The] chief appraiser’s compensation may [not] be directly or indirectly linked to the expectation of an increase in the total market, appraised, or taxable value of property in the appraisal district."

This sentence was derived by striking and replacing existing negative phrasing, clarifying that no portion of the compensation may be linked to expected valuation increases. While this construction is functional, it relies on bracketed substitutions and the removal of a double negative, which can reduce clarity during interpretation.

The Committee Substitute version, on the other hand, likely restructures the same content for better readability and legal precision. Although the intent remains unchanged—preventing appraisal districts from using valuation performance-based incentives—the substitute version may also incorporate technical adjustments for drafting style, readability, and compliance with legislative drafting norms (as guided by the Texas Legislative Council Drafting Manual).

Furthermore, the Committee Substitute includes a clear legislative history at the top of the bill, identifying committee action and vote tallies, which are not present in the original version. This additional context signals that the substitute version was advanced after deliberation and bipartisan support, with no opposition votes recorded in committee.

Overall, the Committee Substitute refines rather than alters the intent of the original bill. It improves upon the original language by providing structural clarity while maintaining the core prohibition on compensation incentives tied to increasing property values.
Author
Kelly Hancock
Co-Author
Phil King
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), SB 2452 is not expected to have any fiscal implications for the State of Texas. The bill merely changes the criteria by which a chief appraiser’s compensation can be determined, specifically prohibiting the use of expected increases in appraised property values as a factor. Since the bill does not mandate any new expenditures, programs, or reporting requirements at the state level, it is considered to be cost-neutral for state operations.

At the local government level, the bill similarly carries no significant fiscal impact. Appraisal district boards already control budgetary decisions, including chief appraiser salaries, and this bill simply narrows the permissible basis for those salary determinations. It does not alter total compensation levels, introduce new administrative burdens, or require any additional staffing. Therefore, any adjustments that appraisal districts may need to make to comply with the new restriction are expected to be minimal and absorbable within existing budgets.

Importantly, the bill may indirectly promote fiscal stability by reinforcing objectivity and reducing incentives for inflated appraisals that can distort local tax bases. While these benefits are more qualitative than quantifiable, they support a more predictable and equitable tax environment over the long term without imposing measurable costs. Overall, SB 2452 is designed to promote policy integrity in appraisal practices without affecting government budgets at either the state or local level.

Vote Recommendation Notes

SB 2452 receives a favorable recommendation for passage based on its reinforcement of ethical appraisal practices and strong alignment with liberty-minded principles. The bill’s central objective is to ensure that the chief appraiser’s compensation is not, in any form, linked to the expectation of increased property values within an appraisal district. While current law already prohibits direct links between salary and rising valuations, SB 2452 closes loopholes that have allowed for more indirect incentive structures tied to performance benchmarks such as compliance with the Property Value Study. These incentives risk compromising the objectivity of appraisers and skewing property valuations for tax purposes.

The bill analysis and author’s intent clarify that SB 2452 responds to documented concerns about hidden performance incentives that reward aggressive valuation strategies. Such practices potentially undermine taxpayer trust and may result in higher property tax burdens for individuals and businesses. By expressly prohibiting compensation structures based on the “expectation” of valuation increases, the bill strengthens the impartiality of appraisal functions, a cornerstone of a fair property tax system.

From a liberty-focused perspective, SB 2452 supports limited government and private property rights by removing perverse financial incentives that could lead to unjustified tax increases. The bill imposes no fiscal burden on the state or local entities and does not expand rulemaking authority. Its narrow and targeted scope respects local control over budget matters while safeguarding appraisal neutrality. Therefore, the bill promotes transparency, fairness, and accountability in a key area of public finance without expanding government power—making it worthy of a strong “Yes” vote. Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on SB 2452.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill protects property owners from biased or inflated appraisals that could increase their tax burdens unfairly. By removing financial incentives that might push chief appraisers to raise property values, the bill defends individual rights against coercive taxation practices that may not reflect true market conditions.
  • Personal Responsibility: While the bill does not directly impact citizens' personal responsibilities, it encourages accountability among public officials. Chief appraisers will be held to a higher ethical standard, ensuring their actions are based on fair market assessments rather than personal gain. However, it doesn’t impose new responsibilities on individuals themselves.
  • Free Enterprise: SB 2452 creates a more predictable and neutral property tax environment, which benefits business owners and investors. By preventing artificially high appraisals, the bill ensures that businesses aren’t penalized through inflated tax bills, encouraging fair market conditions and long-term investment stability.
  • Private Property Rights: At its core, this bill defends property owners from potentially manipulative practices that could lead to excessive taxation. It reinforces the principle that government should not undermine the value or usability of private property through backdoor financial incentives that distort appraisals.
  • Limited Government: The bill curtails government overreach by ensuring appraisal districts cannot use taxpayer-funded salary structures to indirectly raise local revenue through inflated property valuations. It imposes a clear boundary on local government authority and aligns with the constitutional idea of neutral and limited tax administration.
View Bill Text and Status