89th Legislature

SB 2843

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
Free Enterprise
Property Rights
Personal Responsibility
Limited Government
Individual Liberty
Digest

SB 2843  directs the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), in collaboration with three major state research institutions — the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine, the Texas Tech University School of Veterinary Medicine, and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center — to conduct a comprehensive study of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) management in Texas. CWD is a fatal, transmissible neurological disease affecting deer and other cervids. This legislation seeks to assess the effectiveness of TPWD's current rules and policies in containing the disease and to explore the genetic resistance of various cervid populations to CWD.

The study must include a comparative analysis between Texas' disease management approaches and those used by other states, a review of the benefits and deficiencies in existing Texas regulations, and a scientific analysis of cervid genotypes for CWD resistance. Public input is a required component of the study: the department must hold a public hearing and maintain an online portal open for at least 60 days to collect public comments. Additionally, TPWD must provide responses to all comments submitted.

The final report is due by December 1, 2026, and will be provided to the Governor, the Lieutenant Governor, the Speaker of the House, TPWD leadership, and key legislative committees. Importantly, the bill mandates that the study and report be carried out using existing resources, ensuring no additional taxpayer burden. The bill takes effect on September 1, 2025, and expires on May 31, 2027, preventing it from establishing any ongoing new government program or permanent regulation.

The originally filed version of SB 2843 directed the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) alone to conduct a study evaluating the effectiveness of its rules and policies related to the management of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in cervids. This version of the bill placed the full responsibility for the study on the agency itself, utilizing existing resources. It also required a public hearing and a 60-day online comment period, with a mandate that the department respond to public comments. The study was to include a comparative analysis of Texas rules with those of other states, an evaluation of cervid genetic resistance to CWD, and incorporation of relevant scientific and statistical data.

The Committee Substitute keeps the core framework intact but introduces an important enhancement: it assigns the study to a collaborative effort between TPWD and three prominent academic institutions — Texas A&M, Texas Tech University School of Veterinary Medicine, and the UT Southwestern Medical Center’s Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute. By doing so, the substitute broadens the scientific rigor and independence of the study, ensuring that external experts in veterinary medicine and neuroscience contribute to the assessment.

Additionally, while the public input process remains essentially the same, the substitute refines the language around public comment procedures to clarify expectations. Structurally, the Committee Substitute is more deliberate in mandating a comparative analysis with other states' CWD policies and emphasizes both the benefits and deficiencies of Texas’ existing approach. Overall, the Committee Substitute transforms the bill from an internal agency review to a more transparent, academically robust study without expanding its cost, scope, or timeline.

Author
Charles Perry
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), SB 2843 would have no significant fiscal implication to the State​. The bill directs the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), working alongside several university research institutions, to conduct a study on Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) using existing resources. It is explicitly assumed that any costs associated with carrying out the study — including public hearings, management of an online comment portal, and report preparation — could be absorbed within the current operational budgets of TPWD and the participating universities.

Moreover, the bill does not authorize new funding appropriations, create new programs, or mandate any new regulatory frameworks, all of which would typically carry additional costs. Instead, it relies on collaboration among already funded state agencies and institutions, focusing efforts within their current scopes of work.

Finally, there is no fiscal impact anticipated for units of local government. Local governments are neither required to contribute resources nor expected to bear any new responsibilities under the bill​. Therefore, SB 2843 is designed to achieve its objectives without increasing the financial burden on the state or its political subdivisions.

Vote Recommendation Notes

While study bills often present legitimate concerns about unnecessary government expansion or laying the groundwork for new regulations, SB 2843 is a tightly constrained proposal that avoids these pitfalls. The bill simply directs a one-time, time-limited study on Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) management, conducted using existing resources, and automatically expires in 2027. It does not grow the size or scope of government, create new permanent programs, or expand regulatory authority​​.

Importantly, there is no new cost to taxpayers. The Legislative Budget Board confirms that the study can be conducted with no significant fiscal impact and no new appropriations​. Further, the bill imposes no new regulatory burden on private landowners, individuals, or businesses; it strictly mandates research, public input, and reporting​. It respects limited government principles by ensuring that future legislative or administrative actions will still require separate debate and authorization.

Recognizing the legitimate skepticism toward studies that sometimes become vehicles for regulatory expansion, this bill is carefully framed to prevent such outcomes. It focuses on protecting an economically vital industry — deer hunting and breeding — while mandating transparency, scientific rigor, and public engagement. Thus, although general caution toward government studies is warranted, Texas Policy Research recommends that state lawmakers vote YES on SB 2843 based on its narrow, fiscally responsible, and liberty-respecting design.

  • The bill promotes individual liberty by requiring transparency and public participation. It gives individuals the opportunity to comment formally on how government rules are working (or failing) in managing CWD, and mandates that every comment receive a response​. It does not impose new restrictions, mandates, or intrusions on private citizens.
  • By subjecting existing government policies to scientific and public scrutiny, the bill holds government agencies responsible for ensuring that their rules are justified and effective. It invites honest review rather than assuming that current regulatory approaches are above question.
  • Healthy wildlife populations directly support rural economic activity — particularly hunting, tourism, and deer breeding industries. By aiming to improve disease management without creating new burdens, the bill helps sustain free-market activities important to rural Texas, without new business restrictions​.
  • Landowners and private cervid breeders have a strong stake in wildlife health policies. This bill enhances property rights indirectly by promoting a public, science-based review of policies that could affect private deer herds and hunting land, ensuring that government rules impacting private property are justified and reevaluated where needed.
  • The bill carefully respects limited government. It requires no new taxes, no new regulatory authority, and no permanent government expansion. It sunsets automatically on May 31, 2027​. While study bills always carry some risk of future government action, this specific study is carefully framed to limit that risk, and any future regulatory proposals would require separate legislative approval.
Related Legislation
View Bill Text and Status