Menu

SB 455

Relating to arbitration provisions in surplus lines insurance contracts.
Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
positive
Free Enterprise
positive
Property Rights
positive
Personal Responsibility
positive
Limited Government
positive
Individual Liberty
Digest
SB 455 amends the Texas Insurance Code to impose new requirements on arbitration provisions within surplus lines insurance contracts for risks located entirely in Texas. Surplus lines insurance refers to coverage offered by insurers not licensed in the state but legally eligible to provide specialized policies. These policies are often used when standard insurers decline coverage, making regulatory clarity critical for consumer protection.

The bill specifically adds a new subsection to Section 981.101, mandating that any arbitration clause within such a surplus lines policy must stipulate that arbitration proceedings be conducted in Texas, governed by Texas law, and interpreted under Texas legal principles. A narrow exception allows the venue to be changed if both the insurer and policyholder agree in writing after the insurer provides notice and grants the policyholder a premium credit to offset any costs resulting from the venue change. This ensures that consumers are not financially disadvantaged by being compelled to arbitrate out of state.

The legislation aims to provide consistency and legal fairness to Texas-based policyholders by rooting dispute resolution in familiar laws and jurisdictions. By doing so, it prevents insurers from imposing arbitration clauses that favor venues or legal systems outside Texas, which could complicate or disadvantage policyholders.

The Committee Substitute for SB 455 introduces notable refinements to the originally filed version, primarily centered around the flexibility and fairness of arbitration venue provisions in surplus lines insurance contracts. The originally filed bill required all arbitration proceedings under such contracts to be conducted in Texas and governed by Texas law, with no exceptions. This approach aimed to protect Texas policyholders by ensuring legal disputes occurred within a familiar jurisdiction, but it also imposed a rigid and potentially burdensome mandate on insurers and policyholders seeking alternative arrangements.

In contrast, the Committee Substitute version retains the core requirement that arbitration must be governed by Texas law and interpreted under Texas legal principles but introduces a conditional allowance for out-of-state arbitration. Specifically, it permits arbitration to take place outside Texas if both parties agree to it, the insurer provides prior written notice of the change, and the policyholder receives a premium credit to offset the additional costs incurred due to the venue change. This added flexibility reflects a more balanced approach, accommodating the operational needs of insurers while still protecting policyholders from undue financial hardship.

Additionally, the Committee Substitute strengthens consumer protections without weakening the bill's original intent. By requiring a premium credit for venue changes, the bill ensures that policyholders are not disadvantaged or coerced into accepting arbitration terms that could be cost-prohibitive. These enhancements make the bill more practical and equitable, increasing its likelihood of broader support among stakeholders. Overall, the substitute version achieves a more nuanced and workable solution while preserving the original bill’s consumer-focused goals.
Author (1)
Mayes Middleton
Co-Author (1)
Sarah Eckhardt
Sponsor (5)
Matt Morgan
Jeffrey Barry
Ann Johnson
Cassandra Garcia Hernandez
John Bryant
Co-Sponsor (100)

Contact the Author

Sen. Mayes Middleton

Capitol Phone:
(512) 463-0111
Capitol Office:
EXT E1.706
E-Mail:
[email protected]
Visit Official Website
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), SB 455 will have minimal fiscal implications. The report states that the bill would not result in any significant fiscal impact to the State of Texas. This conclusion suggests that the administrative changes required to enforce the new arbitration provisions in surplus lines insurance contracts can be implemented within existing resources by the Texas Department of Insurance or other relevant state agencies.

Furthermore, there are no anticipated fiscal implications for local governments. This indicates that the bill does not impose new regulatory burdens, enforcement duties, or costs on county or municipal governments. The nature of the bill—targeting contract terms within a niche area of the insurance market—means its effects are contained within private contractual arrangements and do not necessitate additional public expenditures or infrastructure.

In essence, SB 455 is designed to establish clearer legal and procedural standards for arbitration in certain insurance contracts without creating a financial burden on taxpayers or governmental bodies. Its implementation is expected to be absorbed by existing regulatory frameworks and agency capacities.

Vote Recommendation Notes

SB 455 reflects a well-calibrated response to concerns about the jurisdictional and legal fairness of arbitration clauses in surplus lines insurance contracts. These contracts, which fill critical gaps in the insurance market by covering unique or high-risk scenarios that standard insurers avoid, are currently not held to Texas-specific arbitration venues or legal standards. This can result in Texas policyholders being subject to unfamiliar laws and distant venues for dispute resolution, raising significant fairness and accessibility concerns.

The Committee Substitute version of SB 455 addresses these concerns while incorporating a flexible, consumer-friendly compromise. It requires arbitration clauses in surplus lines policies covering risks wholly within Texas to stipulate arbitration in Texas under Texas law. However, it allows both parties to mutually agree to an alternative venue only after the insurer provides written notice and compensates the policyholder with a premium credit for additional costs. This change ensures that the bill enhances legal protections for Texans while recognizing legitimate business needs and avoiding rigid mandates.

The bill imposes no significant fiscal impact on the state or local governments, and it avoids creating new rulemaking burdens. It strikes an effective balance between preserving individual liberty and contract fairness, promoting responsible business practices, and respecting the principle of limited government. Given this sound approach to correcting a documented legal vulnerability in surplus lines policies, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on SB 455.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill enhances individual liberty by ensuring that Texas policyholders are not forced into out-of-state arbitration processes governed by unfamiliar laws. Arbitration conducted in Texas under Texas law ensures that individuals are better able to understand and assert their rights, providing them with a fairer forum for dispute resolution. The bill also preserves choice by allowing policyholders to agree to a different venue with compensation, thereby respecting autonomy while reducing coercive leverage by insurers.
  • Personal Responsibility: The bill encourages personal responsibility by requiring both parties to adhere to clear legal standards for dispute resolution. It does not absolve either side of their obligations but instead makes arbitration provisions more transparent and predictable. The provision that the insurer must offer a premium credit if a change of venue is agreed upon further enforces corporate accountability.
  • Free Enterprise: While the bill imposes certain conditions on arbitration clauses, it maintains room for negotiated flexibility. Insurers can still request alternative arbitration venues, provided they compensate policyholders for the inconvenience. This strikes a balance between regulating potential overreach by insurers and preserving their ability to operate competitively within a clear legal framework, supporting a free but fair market environment.
  • Private Property Rights: By mandating that surplus lines insurance contracts be interpreted under Texas law, the bill strengthens the predictability and enforceability of these agreements for Texas property owners. This is crucial in insurance, where interpretation of coverage terms can significantly affect property-related claims and outcomes.
  • Limited Government: The bill narrowly targets a specific issue—arbitration fairness in surplus lines insurance—and does not establish new bureaucracies, regulatory agencies, or expansive rulemaking authority. It leverages existing infrastructure and imposes modest, well-defined requirements. This aligns with the principle of limited government by addressing a gap in consumer protection without broad regulatory overreach.
Related Legislation
View Bill Text and Status
Home
© Copyright 2026 - Texas Policy Research
Texas Policy Research Action (TRPA) is a 501c4 organization

Texas Policy Research Initiative (TRPI) is a 501c3 organization

P.O. Box 2408, Weatherford, TX 76086