According to the Legislative Budget Board's Fiscal Note, SB 703 is not expected to have a significant fiscal impact on the state. The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR), which will oversee the enforcement of the bill's provisions, is assumed to be able to absorb any costs associated with the new licensing restrictions and revocation procedures within its existing budget. Similarly, other agencies, such as the Department of Information Resources, are not expected to require additional funding to implement the bill’s provisions.
Additionally, no fiscal impact is anticipated for local governments, meaning cities and counties will not incur additional costs related to enforcement or compliance with the new regulations. The bill’s focus on licensing enforcement and statutory alignment allows for implementation without the need for additional resources or expanded regulatory infrastructure.
SB 703 strengthens consumer protections and professional accountability in the massage therapy industry by tightening licensing restrictions and revoking eligibility for individuals convicted of serious crimes, such as human trafficking and sexual misconduct. By preventing bad actors from obtaining or maintaining a license, the bill upholds public safety and ethical business practices without imposing excessive regulatory burdens. This aligns with the principles of individual liberty and personal responsibility, ensuring that licensed professionals adhere to legal and ethical standards while safeguarding the rights of consumers.
From a free enterprise perspective, SB 703 does not introduce unnecessary government intervention but instead ensures a fair and ethical marketplace by removing individuals who engage in criminal activities. The bill also upholds private property rights by allowing legitimate businesses to operate free from the reputational and financial harm caused by bad actors in the industry. Importantly, the legislation is targeted and limited in scope, applying only to those convicted of specific offenses rather than expanding government oversight indiscriminately.
Finally, SB 703 is fiscally neutral, meaning it does not impose additional costs on the state or local governments, as confirmed by the Legislative Budget Board’s fiscal note. The committee substitute improves clarity and enforcement mechanisms while keeping the bill’s intent intact. Given its balance between public safety, market fairness, and minimal government overreach, SB 703 aligns with core limited government principles and merits support.