89th Legislature

SB 920

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
Free Enterprise
Property Rights
Personal Responsibility
Limited Government
Individual Liberty
Digest
SB 920 seeks to amend Section 22.052 of the Texas Education Code to expand the authority of public and private schools regarding the administration of nonprescription medications to students. Under current law, school personnel can administer medication to students only with a written request from a parent or legal guardian and, in the case of prescription medication, only under certain conditions related to labeling and packaging. SB 920 retains these provisions but introduces new flexibility for nonprescription medications.

The key change introduced by the bill allows school district, open-enrollment charter school, or private school employees—including nurses—to administer nonprescription medications to students without requiring a written protocol or further authorization from a licensed healthcare provider. This authority, however, is contingent upon the school having adopted a policy allowing such administration and receiving a written request from the student’s parent or legal guardian. The bill does not compel schools to implement such policies; it merely permits them to do so if they choose.

Additionally, SB 920 preserves civil immunity for schools and their employees when administering medication under an adopted policy, as long as they comply with the basic requirements—chiefly, receiving written parental consent. This legal protection is intended to encourage schools to provide appropriate support for student health without exposing them to increased liability risks. By clarifying and expanding the scope of allowable practices for administering nonprescription medications, SB 920 aims to streamline student care in educational settings and reduce the need for parents or caregivers to interrupt their day for minor health issues.

The originally filed version of SB 920 focused primarily on clarifying that open-enrollment charter schools and private schools—as well as their employees—would be granted the same civil liability immunity as public school employees when administering medication to students. It created a new Section 22.0521 of the Education Code to mirror the existing provisions that applied to public schools under Section 22.052, with slight modifications. This new section explicitly allowed volunteer physicians or nurses who are covered by school-provided liability insurance to administer nonprescription or prescription medications to students. It also amended the Occupations Code to clarify that school-based medication administration under these provisions does not constitute the practice of nursing, as long as statutory conditions are met.

In contrast, the Committee Substitute for SB 920 consolidates and simplifies the structure of the bill by eliminating the separate Section 22.0521 and instead amending and expanding the existing Section 22.052 to include all schools—public, charter, and private—within the same framework. The substitute version introduces a new Subsection (a-1), which permits any school employee (including nurses) to administer nonprescription medications without a physician’s written protocol, so long as a written request from the parent or guardian is on file and the school has adopted an appropriate policy.

Importantly, while the original version included a broader authorization for volunteer medical professionals to administer medications and referenced liability coverage conditions, the substitute version removes this language entirely. It places the focus instead on parental authorization and institutional policy as the guiding framework for nonprescription medication administration while preserving immunity from liability under compliant conditions.

Overall, the Committee Substitute streamlines the bill, extends its scope to all school types under one statutory section, and tightens the focus on school discretion and parental involvement rather than volunteer medical personnel provisions.


Author
Kevin Sparks
Co-Author
Carol Alvarado
Sponsor
Donna Howard
Fiscal Notes
According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), SB 920 is not expected to have any fiscal impact on the State of Texas. The bill allows school personnel to administer nonprescription medications with parental consent and under locally adopted policies, but it does not require any new expenditures, mandates, or state-funded programs. As such, the bill's implementation does not necessitate additional funding or staffing at the state level.

Similarly, there is no anticipated fiscal impact on local governments, including public school districts, open-enrollment charter schools, or private schools. Because the legislation merely permits schools to adopt policies for nonprescription medication administration—without mandating it—the costs associated with implementation are discretionary and can be managed within existing local budgets and staffing structures.

The fiscal neutrality of SB 920 is affirmed by relevant state agencies, including the Texas Education Agency and the Texas Board of Nursing, both of which foresee no new obligations or cost burdens resulting from the bill's passage. This positions SB 920 as a policy-driven bill that expands flexibility and parental rights without imposing financial obligations on the state or local entities.
Vote Recommendation Notes
Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on SB 920 based on its clarification of school nurses’ legal authority, protection of parental rights, and alignment with the principles of limited government and individual liberty. As explained in the bill analysis, the legislation responds to confusion that arose in 2024 when the Texas Board of Nursing clarified that, absent a valid medical order, school nurses could be seen as acting outside the scope of their license by administering over-the-counter medications—even when a parent had provided consent. This created uncertainty and unnecessary hurdles for schools and families, potentially restricting student access to basic, safe healthcare supports.

SB 920 resolves this concern by amending Section 22.052 of the Education Code to explicitly allow licensed school employees, including nurses, to administer nonprescription medications without a doctor's note—as long as the parent has provided written permission and the medication is properly labeled and unexpired. This statutory clarification not only preserves current common practices but also ensures that school personnel acting in good faith are shielded from civil or disciplinary liability. The bill also brings charter and private schools fully into the same liability protection framework already afforded to public schools, promoting fairness and consistency across educational institutions.

The bill upholds individual liberty and parental rights by deferring to a parent’s authority to authorize care for their child without requiring an additional healthcare provider’s involvement. It also supports limited government by avoiding new mandates or regulatory burdens while resolving ambiguity in existing law. With no fiscal impact to the state or local governments and broad support from educational and health stakeholders, SB 920 is a pragmatic and liberty-affirming legislative fix.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill directly supports individual liberty by affirming the right of parents to make health-related decisions for their children without unnecessary interference from the state or healthcare system. By allowing schools to administer nonprescription medications with only parental consent—without requiring a physician’s standing order or protocol—the bill respects families' ability to manage minor health concerns in a way that aligns with their values and preferences. This limits state overreach into personal and parental choices and empowers individuals to maintain autonomy over their child’s well-being during school hours.
  • Personal Responsibility: The bill reinforces personal responsibility by requiring that any administration of nonprescription medication be based on a written request from the parent or legal guardian. It places the decision-making power in the hands of families while ensuring that school personnel are not compelled to act outside their comfort or expertise unless an appropriate policy is in place. This shared responsibility model ensures that both parents and schools are accountable for students’ care within reasonable boundaries.
  • Free Enterprise: While the bill does not have a direct economic or market-related component, its indirect effect supports free enterprise by reducing barriers for parents, particularly working families. By avoiding unnecessary doctor visits for minor medications (e.g., pain relievers, antihistamines), families save time and healthcare costs, making it easier for parents to remain productive in the workforce. It also avoids creating new bureaucratic demands that could limit innovation or flexibility in school health practices.
  • Private Property Rights: The bill has no direct impact on private property rights.
  • Limited Government: The bill embodies the principle of limited government by clarifying statutory authority rather than expanding regulatory control. It resolves confusion created by regulatory interpretations without adding new mandates or funding obligations. Instead of prescribing a one-size-fits-all solution, it allows each school to adopt its own policies regarding medication administration, preserving local governance and avoiding top-down imposition from state agencies. It also appropriately limits the scope of nursing regulation by carving out a narrow exception aligned with established school practices.
View Bill Text and Status