Wednesday, the Texas House of Representatives passed Senate Bill 21 (SB 21) by a vote of 101 to 42, pushing the proposal closer to becoming law. This follows the Texas Senate’s earlier approval of the bill on March 6 by a vote of 25 to 5.
SB 21, the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Investment Act, seeks to establish a state-managed Bitcoin reserve, enabling Texas to purchase, hold, and oversee cryptocurrency assets using public funds. With support from Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, who has marked it as a legislative priority, the bill now goes back to the Texas Senate for final consideration before going to Governor Greg Abbott’s desk.
What is the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve?
SB 21 would create the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve as a special fund outside the state treasury, administered by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. The fund would be financed through legislative appropriations, dedicated revenue streams, investment proceeds, and voluntary cryptocurrency donations. Supporters argue that establishing a Bitcoin reserve will allow the State of Texas to hedge against inflation, enhance financial resilience, and position itself as a national leader in digital asset innovation.
Only cryptocurrencies with an average market capitalization of at least $500 billion over the prior 12 months are eligible for investment, a safeguard designed to restrict holdings to relatively stable, high-profile digital assets—chiefly Bitcoin, under current market conditions. This requirement reflects an effort to balance Texas’s cryptocurrency ambitions with prudent investment standards.
How SB 21 Changed During the Texas Legislative Process
Since its introduction, SB 21 has undergone notable revisions during committee deliberations, particularly in the House Committee on Delivery of Government Efficiency. The most recent substitute version enhances regulatory clarity, introduces risk management measures, and limits the Comptroller’s authority to mitigate speculative misuse of public resources.
Under the amended bill, the Texas Comptroller may contract with third-party custodians and liquidity providers who meet specific standards. These entities must be based in Texas, maintain audited financial records, and have extensive experience in digital asset management. This approach is intended to ensure secure handling of the state’s cryptocurrency holdings while keeping the operational benefits localized within Texas’s economy.
In a further expansion of its scope, the bill allows the Comptroller to engage in staking cryptocurrency assets, using financial derivatives, and loaning digital assets, provided legal ownership remains with the state and such activities are executed through qualified third parties. These additions introduce greater financial complexity and potential revenue streams, but also come with elevated risk if not managed with restraint and expertise
Donations, Transfers, and Transparency Under the Texas Bitcoin Reserve Plan
One of the more controversial components of the bill is its treatment of cryptocurrency donations. SB 21 permits only Texas-domiciled individuals to contribute to the reserve and empowers the Comptroller to reject any donation for any reason. Donors are also prohibited from influencing how their digital assets are managed. While this framework is designed to reduce the risk of illicit contributions or political manipulation, the bill does not include strong transparency provisions or anti-money laundering safeguards beyond domicile verification.
For purposes of managing state liquidity, SB 21 allows the Comptroller to temporarily liquidate digital assets and transfer proceeds to the state treasury. These funds must be returned promptly along with any interest earned, but the provision introduces a new avenue through which cryptocurrency may influence general revenue cash flows. This functionality could invite timing-based decisions around buying and selling Bitcoin, raising concerns about speculative trading under the guise of treasury management.
In terms of transparency, the bill requires the Comptroller to publish a biennial report detailing the reserve’s holdings, valuation changes, and administrative actions. Critics argue that biennial reporting is insufficient given the real-time volatility of digital asset markets. More frequent audits or quarterly reports would be necessary to adequately safeguard taxpayer interests and maintain public accountability.
Oversight and Administration of the State-Run Bitcoin Fund
SB 21 establishes a five-member advisory committee to help guide the administration of the Texas Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. This group will include the Comptroller, one member of the Comptroller’s existing investment advisory board, and three individuals with cryptocurrency investment expertise—all appointed at the Comptroller’s discretion. The committee is charged with recommending asset valuation practices and investment policies, but its role is strictly advisory and does not include any formal checks or binding authority over investment decisions.
While the creation of an advisory board adds a layer of review, it falls short of ensuring genuine oversight. Given that all members serve at the will of the Comptroller and are not independently confirmed, the board’s independence and effectiveness in curbing mismanagement or overreach is inherently limited.
Risks to Taxpayers and the Role of Bitcoin in Texas State Government
Despite revisions that improve SB 21’s structure, the underlying risks remain substantial. Bitcoin and other digital assets are notoriously volatile, and while the market capitalization threshold aims to reduce exposure to unstable coins, significant downside risks persist. If the market crashes or underperforms, Texas taxpayers could be on the hook for massive losses without a clear recovery pathway.
The bill also represents a philosophical shift in the role of state government. Rather than simply fostering a regulatory environment conducive to cryptocurrency innovation, SB 21 authorizes direct government participation in digital asset markets. This could distort free-market dynamics, discourage private-sector innovation, and entangle the state in speculative investment strategies it is ill-equipped to manage.
Adding to these concerns is the absence of a clear exit strategy. The bill does not specify conditions under which the reserve must divest from underperforming assets, nor does it outline a rebalancing mechanism to prevent prolonged losses. Without a defined liquidation framework, the state may end up holding volatile assets indefinitely, regardless of performance.
Should Texas Create a State-Run Cryptocurrency Reserve?
SB 21 is a novel and ambitious proposal, but its implementation would represent a dramatic departure from traditional fiscal policy. Supporters argue that it modernizes state investments and prepares Texas for the next financial frontier. Detractors caution that it creates new risks, expands government authority, and undermines core free-market principles.
From a liberty-oriented perspective, the bill raises red flags across several key areas. It increases the size and scope of government by creating a new bureaucratic apparatus to manage speculative investments. It interferes with free enterprise by positioning the state as a direct market participant in cryptocurrency. It puts taxpayer funds at risk without adequate protections or frequent oversight. And it opens the door to future political manipulation of state-held digital assets, a prospect with far-reaching implications.
While some improvements were made during the legislative process, the final version of SB 21 still falls short of addressing these critical concerns. If Texas truly wants to lead in cryptocurrency innovation, it should focus on deregulation, education, and facilitating private-sector development, not managing a taxpayer-funded Bitcoin hedge fund.
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
