Estimated Time to Read: 10 minutes
New data from the Texas Education Agency (updated March 12, 2026) provides a comprehensive view of superintendent compensation across more than 1,200 public school districts in Texas. The latest figures confirm that superintendent salaries continue to rise, both at the highest levels and across a growing share of districts statewide.
This trend is not new, but the updated data shows it is accelerating. More superintendents are earning salaries that place them among the highest-paid public employees in Texas. At the same time, the number of districts offering compensation above traditional benchmarks continues to expand.
The timing of this increase raises important questions. Texas public schools are navigating enrollment declines and financial pressure, yet administrative pay continues to move in the opposite direction.
Growth in High Texas Superintendent Salaries
The 2026 TEA dataset includes approximately 1,220 superintendent positions across traditional independent school districts and charter systems. Within that group, a growing number of superintendents are earning salaries that exceed $300,000 annually.
Based on the updated figures, 117 superintendents earn at least $300,000 in base salary. Within that group, 16 earn $400,000 or more, and three exceed $500,000 in base salary alone. These numbers reflect a meaningful increase compared to prior years and demonstrate that high-end compensation is becoming more common across the state.
It is also important to understand how compensation is reported. The TEA dataset distinguishes between base salary and total compensation. Base salary reflects the contracted annual pay, while total compensation includes additional benefits such as housing allowances, stipends, bonuses, and retirement contributions. In many cases, total compensation pushes overall earnings significantly higher than the base salary alone.
Top Texas Superintendent Salaries
At the top end of the pay scale, superintendent compensation now rivals that of senior executives in large organizations. The highest reported earners receive total compensation packages exceeding $600,000 annually, placing them among the highest-paid public employees in the state.
The following table highlights a snapshot of the highest-paid superintendents in Texas based on the most recent TEA data. This provides a clearer picture of how compensation compares across districts of varying size.
| Rank | County | School District | Superintendent | Base Salary | Total Compensation | Enrollment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bexar | Harlandale ISD | Soto, Gerardo | $627,749 | $655,737 | 11,114 |
| 2 | Tarrant | Birdville ISD | Stinson, Selena Gayle | $368,041 | $551,576 | 22,123 |
| 3 | Harris | Cypress-Fairbanks ISD | Killian, Douglas Wayne | $496,231 | $520,231 | 114,697 |
| 4 | Chambers | Barbers Hill ISD | Poole, Gregory | $513,601 | $513,601 | 8,088 |
| 5 | Harris | Klein ISD | McGown, Jenny | $421,801 | $508,554 | 51,236 |
| 6 | Bell | Killeen ISD | Davis, King Roy | $508,057 | $508,057 | 41,391 |
| 7 | Travis | Lake Travis ISD | Null, Curtis | $468,716 | $483,116 | 10,771 |
| 8 | Harris | Katy ISD | Gregorski, Kenneth | $426,088 | $474,440 | 95,295 |
| 9 | Dallas | Garland ISD | Lopez, Ricardo | $457,447 | $467,047 | 49,151 |
| 10 | Harris | Houston ISD | Miles, Floyd Mike | $462,000 | $462,000 | 168,812 |
Source: Texas Education Agency (TEA) Superintendent Salary Reports 2025-2026
This snapshot reinforces a key point. While some of the highest-paid superintendents lead large districts, others oversee mid-sized or smaller systems. Compensation at the top end is not consistently tied to enrollment size, which raises further questions about how these contracts are structured and justified.
Superintendent Pay Versus Governor Salary
One of the clearest ways to understand the scale of superintendent compensation is to compare it to other high-level public officials in Texas. The Governor of Texas currently earns a salary of $153,750 per year.
When viewed through this lens, the disparity becomes striking. More than 100 superintendents in Texas earn nearly double or more than double the Governor’s salary based on base pay alone. At the highest levels, several superintendents earn three to four times as much as the state’s chief executive.
Even within the top ten highest-paid superintendents, every individual listed earns significantly more than the Governor, often by hundreds of thousands of dollars when total compensation is considered.
This comparison is not meant to suggest that superintendent roles are identical to those of the Governor. However, it does provide a useful benchmark for understanding how administrative compensation in public education has grown relative to other taxpayer-funded positions.
For taxpayers, the question becomes whether this level of compensation reflects the value delivered, especially in an environment marked by declining enrollment and ongoing budget pressure.
Do High Salaries Reflect Competition?
A common defense of rising superintendent salaries is that districts must offer competitive compensation in order to attract and retain administrative talent. Supporters of this argument often point to a national market for education leadership, where experienced superintendents can move between states and districts, creating upward pressure on salaries.
At a surface level, this argument carries some intuitive appeal. Large school systems manage significant budgets, oversee thousands of employees, and are responsible for the education of tens of thousands of students. In that context, competitive compensation can be viewed as a tool to recruit qualified leadership. However, the data raises questions about how broadly this argument applies in practice. Many of the highest-paid superintendents in Texas are not leading the largest or most complex districts, and there is little evidence that compensation levels are consistently tied to performance outcomes. If a true national market were driving salaries, one might expect a clearer relationship between pay, district size, and measurable success.
There is also the question of mobility. While some superintendent positions are filled through national searches, many are filled internally or within regional networks. This suggests that the labor market for superintendents may be more localized than the “national competition” argument implies.
Finally, even if competition for talent plays a role, it does not fully explain the steady expansion of salaries across a wide range of districts. The growing number of superintendents earning more than $300,000 indicates that upward pressure on pay is occurring systemwide, not just in districts competing for a limited pool of elite candidates.
The question for taxpayers is not whether competitive pay should exist, but whether the current trajectory reflects genuine market forces tied to performance and demand, or whether it is the result of structural incentives that allow compensation to rise without clear accountability.
If superintendent pay is driven by competition, why isn’t it consistently tied to performance, size, or results?
The Expansion of Six-Figure Salaries
While top earners attract attention, the broader trend lies in the rapid expansion of superintendents earning between $300,000 and $400,000. This group has grown substantially in recent years and now represents a significant portion of district leadership across Texas.
The presence of 117 superintendents earning at least $300,000 suggests that what was once considered an exceptional salary has become increasingly normalized. This shift indicates a broader change in compensation expectations and contract negotiations across districts. The expansion of this salary range reflects systemic growth rather than isolated cases. It suggests that upward pressure on superintendent pay is occurring across multiple regions and district types.
Enrollment Declines and Budget Pressure
At the same time that superintendent salaries are increasing, Texas public school enrollment is declining. Recent statewide figures show enrollment dropping by more than one percent, bringing total student counts below 5.6 million. This represents one of the largest enrollment declines in recent history.
Enrollment plays a central role in school finance, as state funding is largely tied to student attendance. When enrollment declines, districts often face tighter budgets and more difficult financial decisions.
Despite these conditions, superintendent compensation has continued to rise. The contrast between declining enrollment and increasing administrative pay highlights a disconnect in how resources are allocated within the public education system.
No Clear Link to Performance or Size
The data also reveals that superintendent compensation does not consistently correlate with district performance or enrollment size. Highly paid superintendents can be found in both large urban districts and smaller regional systems. Academic performance ratings vary widely among the districts represented in the highest salary tiers. Some top-earning superintendents lead districts with strong outcomes, while others oversee systems with more modest results.
This lack of consistency suggests that compensation decisions are not systematically tied to measurable outcomes. Instead, they appear to be driven by local factors such as contract negotiations, board priorities, and market comparisons rather than standardized performance metrics.
Who Sets Superintendent Pay
Superintendent salaries are determined by locally elected school boards, which negotiate contracts and approve compensation packages. This structure reflects Texas’s tradition of local control in education governance.
While local decision-making allows districts to tailor leadership contracts to their needs, it also results in wide variation in compensation. There is no uniform standard linking pay to enrollment, academic performance, or financial conditions. In many cases, full compensation packages are not immediately transparent to taxpayers, particularly when additional benefits are included. This can make it difficult for the public to fully evaluate the cost of district leadership.
Legislative Context
Despite increasing public attention, there has been limited legislative focus on superintendent compensation. Policymakers have prioritized broader issues such as school finance formulas, teacher pay, and school choice initiatives, while administrative pay structures have largely remained outside the scope of reform efforts.
During the 89th Texas Legislative Session (2025), two bills were filed that directly addressed superintendent compensation: House Bill 901 by State Rep. Brian Harrison (R-Midlothian) and House Bill 2005 by State Rep. Steve Toth (R-The Woodlands). Both sought to bring greater scrutiny and potential limits to superintendent salaries.
Both pieces of legislation were referred to the Texas House State Affairs Committee. However, neither bill was granted a hearing, and neither advanced through the legislative process. As a result, no meaningful statutory changes were made to address superintendent compensation.
The lack of movement on these proposals highlights a broader pattern. Even as superintendent salaries continue to rise and draw public attention, there remains little appetite within the Legislature to directly engage with the issue. Oversight of superintendent pay, therefore, continues to rest almost entirely with local school boards, with minimal statewide accountability mechanisms.
Conclusion
The latest Texas Education Agency data confirms a clear and continuing trend. Superintendent salaries are rising across Texas, both at the highest levels and throughout the broader system. At the same time, enrollment is declining, and districts are facing increased financial pressure. The data shows no consistent relationship between pay and student outcomes or district size, raising questions about how compensation decisions are made. In many cases, superintendent compensation now exceeds that of the Governor of Texas by a wide margin, further underscoring the scale of growth in administrative pay.
For taxpayers, the issue is not simply the size of superintendent salaries. It is whether the current system ensures that compensation is aligned with performance, efficiency, and responsible use of public funds. Efforts to address superintendent compensation have been introduced but have not received legislative consideration, leaving the issue unresolved.
As these trends continue, greater transparency and accountability may become increasingly important in shaping the future of public education spending in Texas.
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
