HB 272

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
positive
Free Enterprise
positive
Property Rights
positive
Personal Responsibility
positive
Limited Government
positive
Individual Liberty
Digest

HB 272 proposes procedural changes to how the State of Texas prosecutes the offense of fraudulent use or possession of credit card or debit card information. This offense is codified under Section 32.315 of the Texas Penal Code and involves the unauthorized obtaining, transferring, or using of another individual's credit or debit card information. Currently, such cases must be prosecuted in the county where the offense was committed. HB 272 adds a new provision that allows prosecutors to alternatively file charges in the county where the victim resides. This aims to reduce the burden on victims who may otherwise have to travel long distances to participate in legal proceedings.

The bill also amends Article 38.19(a) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure to include Penal Code Section 32.315 within the list of specific fraud and identity crimes—such as forgery and identity theft—that follow particular rules of evidence during prosecution. This evidentiary update reinforces the legal framework around fraud-related crimes and aligns procedural standards across similar statutes.

Importantly, HB 272 contains a transition clause specifying that its provisions apply only to criminal proceedings initiated on or after the law’s effective date. Any cases filed before this date would be adjudicated under existing laws. Overall, the bill seeks to improve access to justice for fraud victims, increase prosecutorial flexibility, and maintain consistency within the criminal procedure code.

Author (1)
Mary Perez
Sponsor (1)
Judith Zaffirini
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), HB 272 is not expected to result in any significant fiscal impact to the State of Texas. The legislation's proposed procedural change—allowing the prosecution of certain credit or debit card fraud offenses in either the county of the offense or the victim's residence—does not create new crimes or mandates requiring substantial financial resources for enforcement. It simply modifies the venue for prosecution, which can be administered within the existing capabilities of the judicial system.

The report further notes that any additional administrative or operational costs resulting from the implementation of HB 272 could be absorbed using current resources available to state agencies, particularly those within the judiciary, such as the Office of Court Administration and the Texas Judicial Council.

Additionally, no significant fiscal impact is anticipated for local governments. Counties may experience a minor increase in case volume if more prosecutions occur in victims' home counties, but such shifts are expected to be minimal and manageable without requiring extra funding or staffing. Overall, HB 272 is fiscally neutral and operationally feasible under existing budgetary conditions.

Vote Recommendation Notes

HB 272 builds upon previous legislative efforts to combat the rise in organized financial crimes, such as credit card and debit card skimming, by refining the venue and procedural rules applicable to prosecuting these offenses. The bill extends venue flexibility for the prosecution of fraudulent use or possession of credit or debit card information (Penal Code §32.315) to include both the county where the crime occurred and the county where the victim resides. This mirrors provisions already in place for similar offenses under earlier laws (e.g., HB 2624 and HB 2625 from the 86th Legislature) and closes a critical gap in venue statute coverage for this specific financial crime.

Importantly, HB 272 enhances prosecutorial effectiveness by explicitly stating that proving an intent to defraud a particular individual is not necessary; rather, it is sufficient to show that the conduct was broadly calculated to defraud or injure. This clarification aligns legal treatment of this offense with related fraud and identity crimes, ensuring consistent application across similar cases.

From a liberty perspective, the bill promotes individual liberty and private property rights by giving victims better access to justice without requiring them to travel to distant counties. It promotes personal responsibility by strengthening tools to hold financial criminals accountable. Notably, the bill does not expand government authority or create new crimes, maintaining respect for limited government. There are also no anticipated fiscal burdens on state or local governments, according to the Legislative Budget Board.

Given its narrow scope, victim-centered approach, fiscal neutrality, and reinforcement of existing criminal justice tools, HB 272 is a measured and appropriate response to evolving financial crimes. As such, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 272.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill enhances protections for individuals who are victims of financial crimes by allowing prosecution to take place in the victim's county of residence. This gives victims greater access to justice without requiring them to travel to potentially distant jurisdictions where the crime was physically committed. It reduces the procedural burden on victims and makes it easier to participate in the legal process, thereby upholding their rights and dignity in the justice system.
  • Personal Responsibility: By facilitating more effective prosecution of those who engage in fraudulent use or possession of credit/debit card information, the bill reinforces the concept of accountability. It ensures that individuals who exploit others' financial data face legal consequences regardless of where the victim resides. This sends a strong message that such behavior will be addressed seriously and consistently across counties.
  • Free Enterprise: While not directly targeting businesses, the bill helps foster consumer trust in financial transactions by reinforcing the integrity of digital commerce. Reducing card fraud benefits businesses by limiting losses and potential liabilities associated with fraudulent transactions. Though this is a secondary effect, it aligns with free enterprise principles by supporting a secure commercial environment.
  • Private Property Rights: Credit and debit card information represent extensions of an individual's financial identity and property. Enabling flexible prosecution venues strengthens the protection of that property against theft and misuse. The bill affirms the state's role in safeguarding property rights against financial crimes, especially those executed through digital or decentralized methods like card skimming or information trafficking.
  • Limited Government: The bill does not expand the scope of government authority or create new offenses. It refines venue provisions within existing law, thereby making judicial procedures more efficient and accessible without increasing regulatory oversight or surveillance powers. Additionally, the bill does not create new bureaucratic structures or mandates, preserving a limited and efficient governmental role in criminal justice.
Related Legislation
View Bill Text and Status