HB 3016

Overall Vote Recommendation
Yes
Principle Criteria
positive
Free Enterprise
positive
Property Rights
positive
Personal Responsibility
neutral
Limited Government
positive
Individual Liberty
Digest
HB 3016 proposes amendments to Section 91.056 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code to expand the specific circumstances in which a rental vehicle company may legally void a damage waiver agreement. Damage waivers are commonly included in rental contracts to relieve the renter of financial liability in the event the rental car is damaged or stolen. Current law outlines a few conditions under which this waiver can be voided, such as when a driver causes intentional damage, uses the vehicle while impaired, or provides fraudulent information at the time of rental.

This bill adds a new condition under which the waiver may be voided: when the rented vehicle is stolen and the renter fails to fulfill certain responsibilities. Specifically, if the vehicle is stolen and the renter does not return the ignition key, report the theft to law enforcement within 24 hours, or fully cooperate with the rental company and investigators, the company may void the damage waiver. This addition helps ensure that renters actively participate in safeguarding the property and cooperating in the event of a crime.

The bill includes a transitional provision clarifying that the new law only applies to rental agreements executed on or after the effective date. Agreements entered into before that date remain subject to the law as it existed previously. The purpose of HB 3016 is to reinforce accountability among renters, reduce losses due to theft or negligence, and better align statutory protections with common rental industry practices.

The House engrossed version of HB 3016 and the Senate Committee Substitute share the same fundamental purpose—modifying Section 91.056 of the Texas Business & Commerce Code to expand the circumstances under which a rental vehicle company may void a damage waiver. However, there are subtle but meaningful differences between the two versions in both phrasing and structural presentation.

In the House engrossed version, the language used is relatively concise and direct. It adds a new subdivision (4) that allows the rental company to void the damage waiver if the vehicle is stolen and the renter fails to return the ignition key, file a police report within 24 hours of discovering the theft, and fully cooperate with law enforcement and the rental company. Notably, the phrase "fully cooperate" is used, emphasizing complete engagement by the renter in the investigative process.

In contrast, the Senate Committee Substitute version maintains the same structural framework and legal conditions but replaces “fully cooperate” with the slightly softer and more general “cooperate.” This change could imply a lower standard for renter compliance, potentially reducing the legal threshold needed for the rental company to void the waiver.

Additionally, the Senate version includes procedural details about the bill's progression through committee and indicates it was printed as a committee substitute, while the House version is cleaner and reflects only the legislative text without procedural annotations. These changes are typical when moving from one chamber to the other but do not alter the core policy intent.

Overall, the main distinction lies in the phrasing of the cooperation requirement and the format typical of each chamber’s legislative process. Substantively, both versions aim to improve contractual clarity and renter accountability in cases involving vehicle theft.
Author (5)
John Lujan
Oscar Longoria
Ryan Guillen
Salman Bhojani
Erin Gamez
Sponsor (1)
Brent Hagenbuch
Fiscal Notes

According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), HB 3016 is not expected to have a significant fiscal impact on the state of Texas. The bill’s provisions, which expand the circumstances under which rental companies may void a damage waiver in rental vehicle agreements, are not anticipated to require any new programs, state staffing increases, or substantial expenditures from state funds.

The analysis assumes that any administrative or enforcement responsibilities that may arise—such as clarifications in consumer complaints or legal reviews—could be managed using existing resources by state agencies, such as the Office of the Attorney General. This implies that the operational impact of the bill would be minimal and fall within the agencies' current capacities.

Similarly, the bill does not impose any financial burden on local governments. Counties, cities, or other local entities are not expected to experience increased enforcement costs or new administrative duties as a result of the legislation. In summary, the bill's fiscal footprint is negligible, with no new appropriations or expenditures required at either the state or local level.

Vote Recommendation Notes

HB 3016 addresses a specific and growing challenge in the rental vehicle industry: fraudulent or negligent actions that lead to vehicle theft under the guise of legitimate rental transactions. As detailed in the bill analysis, rental car companies increasingly face scenarios where individuals exploit the protections of collision damage waivers (CDWs) to facilitate organized theft or avoid liability. This bill aims to close that loophole by allowing rental companies to void a CDW only if the renter fails to meet three critical obligations after a theft: returning the ignition key, filing a police report within 24 hours, and cooperating with law enforcement and the rental company.

From a liberty-oriented policy perspective, HB 3016 promotes personal responsibility by holding renters accountable for their conduct and participation in the post-theft investigation process. It supports private property rights by empowering businesses to protect their assets against fraudulent exploitation, while reinforcing free enterprise by reducing financial losses that could destabilize smaller rental operators or lead to higher consumer costs. Importantly, the bill maintains consumer protections by preserving CDW coverage in genuine theft cases—as long as renters fulfill their basic obligations—ensuring it does not over-penalize innocent actors.

The bill has no significant fiscal implications to the state or local governments, meaning its implementation will not require new expenditures or public resources. Furthermore, its legal scope is narrowly tailored, applying prospectively and avoiding unnecessary expansion of government authority. Overall, HB 3016 presents a thoughtful and targeted legislative response to an emerging pattern of abuse, and it strengthens accountability in a way that supports both industry and consumer trust. Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote YES on HB 3016.

  • Individual Liberty: The bill upholds individual liberty by preserving the right of consumers to enter into voluntary contractual agreements, such as damage waivers with rental companies, while ensuring those agreements are not misused. It does not restrict a person’s freedom to rent a vehicle or purchase optional protections like a collision damage waiver (CDW). Instead, it ensures that liberty is exercised within the bounds of honest behavior, thereby reinforcing the balance between freedom and accountability.
  • Personal Responsibility: The bill reinforces the concept that individuals must take responsibility for their actions, especially in the event of a vehicle theft. By requiring renters to return the vehicle key, file a timely police report, and cooperate with investigations to retain CDW protection, the bill sets clear expectations. Those who act negligently or participate in fraudulent activity will no longer be shielded from financial liability. This promotes a culture where freedom is matched by duty.
  • Free Enterprise: The bill enhances the functioning of free markets by strengthening legal tools available to rental car companies to mitigate fraud and recoup losses. This protects the long-term viability and competitiveness of rental businesses, particularly smaller operators who might otherwise be disproportionately harmed by theft schemes. It also ensures that honest customers are not burdened with higher rental rates caused by the abuse of CDWs.
  • Private Property Rights: At its core, the bill defends the right of rental companies to protect their property. By allowing the voiding of damage waivers under specific, narrowly defined circumstances, the legislation helps prevent the abuse of private property through deception or organized criminal activity. It strikes an appropriate balance between protecting consumers and ensuring that rental companies are not unjustly penalized.
  • Limited Government: The bill does not expand the regulatory role of the state nor create new enforcement bodies. Instead, it clarifies existing private contractual rights and obligations under state commercial law. Government involvement remains minimal and facilitative rather than intrusive, consistent with the principle of limited government.
Related Legislation
View Bill Text and Status