In both state and federal legislative bodies, the seniority system has traditionally been used to determine leadership roles and committee assignments for lawmakers. While it may seem that this system values experience as a marker of expertise and stability, in practice, it often leads to a consolidation of power. This system has significantly shaped the governance structures of many legislative bodies across the country.
The Texas Legislature is no exception. However, as political dynamics and Texas demographics evolve, the limitations and drawbacks of the seniority system have become increasingly apparent, leading to questions about its overall efficacy in representation.
Understanding the Seniority System
The seniority system grants certain privileges and responsibilities to lawmakers based on their length of continuous service in the legislature. This system prioritizes tenure over other factors, assigning leadership roles and key committee positions based on the length of service rather than merit, expertise, or capability. In theory, this system rewards dedication and provides legislative continuity. It also reduces power struggles associated with leadership selection since progression is largely predetermined.
However, this system is not without its critics. Detractors argue that seniority discourages innovation, as newer members with fresh ideas or specialized knowledge may be overlooked. It can also entrench outdated policies and maintain the status quo, limiting legislative responsiveness to changing public needs or certain constituencies.
The Texas Legislature’s Approach
The Texas Legislature, comprised of the Texas Senate and Texas House of Representatives, exhibits a hybrid approach in its use of the seniority system. While seniority plays a significant role, it is not the sole factor in determining leadership or committee assignments. However, it is the sole determinant for aspects such as parking spaces, office selections, desk placements on the floor of each legislative chamber, and other similar items. Surprisingly, these allocations are determined by the luck of the draw, specifically a ping pong ball with a number on it, indicating the seniority of the lawmaker within their class of elected officials.
Texas Senate: The Lieutenant Governor, elected statewide, presides over the Senate and wields considerable influence. Committee assignments and chairmanships are a blend of seniority, loyalty, and political strategy, with a strong emphasis on the preferences and priorities of the Lieutenant Governor who has sole discretion.
Texas House of Representatives: The Speaker of the House, elected by the members of the Texas House of Representatives at the beginning of each legislative session, holds significant power, including the authority to appoint committee chairs and committee members. Although seniority is a part of the calculus as provided by the House Rules, Speakers often also weigh political loyalty, expertise, and the strategic needs of the party or their own legislative agendas as well.
At the start of the legislative session, House lawmakers receive two index cards. On one card, they list their committee assignment preferences based on seniority. On the other card, they list their general preferences. These cards are then submitted to the Speaker’s office and factor into the committee assignment decisions. For example, half of the available seats on a committee are determined based on a clear formula of seniority and the other half determined by the preference cards.
This “flexibility” allows for a somewhat dynamic legislative process but also centralizes power in the hands of a few leaders, which can lead to its own set of challenges and criticisms.
Drawbacks and Criticisms
Use of seniority has not been without its criticisms. For example, former State Sen. Konni Burton (R-Colleyville) reflected on her time in the Texas Senate, stating:
“It would frustrate me that the newly elected lawmakers were relegated to the backseat because even though we are newly elected, our constituents deserved someone that would step right in and do what we say we would do.”
The seniority system, even when used partially as in Texas, presents several potential drawbacks:
Stifles Innovation: By prioritizing tenure, the system can sideline new members who may bring innovative solutions and modern perspectives to longstanding challenges.
Concentrates Power: In the Texas Legislature, the power to make or break legislative careers often rests with a few key figures, increasing the risk of power abuses, reducing checks and balances, and ultimately altering the behavior of lawmakers who may choose not to pursue certain priorities of their own constituents based on their own political calculus of its potential success.
Reduces Accountability: When advancement is more about time served than performance or results, there is less incentive for lawmakers to perform well or be responsive to their constituents.
Encourages Partisanship: As leaders appoint committee members based on loyalty and strategy, there can be an increase in partisanship, with key positions often filled by those who align closely with the leadership’s views, potentially marginalizing minority party voices.
Perpetuates Status Quo: Seniority can lead to a legislative body that resists change, as long-standing members maintain control over influential committees and leadership positions, often resisting new ideas or reforms.
Statistical Information
A complete list of the seniority of current lawmakers in the Texas Legislature can be found here.
General Summary
The average age of current Texas state lawmakers is 56. On average, lawmakers have served 5 legislative sessions or 10 years.
Texas Senate
Average Age: 60 years old
Average Number of Full Sessions Served: 5 (10 years)
Longest Tenure:
State Sen. Judith Zaffirini (D-Laredo) was first elected to the Texas Senate in 1987, has served 19 full legislative sessions, and is the current Dean of the Senate.
Additional Tenure Details: 3 State Senators have served for 10 sessions or more (20 years or more)
Texas House of Representatives
Average Age: 55 years old
Average Number of Full Sessions Served: 5 (10 years)
Longest Tenure: State Rep. Tom Craddick (R-Midland) was first elected to the Texas House of Representatives in 1969, has served 28 full legislative sessions, and is the current Dean of the House.
Additional Tenure Details: 17 State Representatives have served for 10 sessions or more (20 years or more)
Conclusion
While the seniority system in the Texas Legislature and other state bodies has its roots in practical and historical precedents, its continued use in the modern legislative landscape is increasingly questioned. The need for a more dynamic and responsive governance structure is clear. Alternatives such as merit-based assignments based on personal experiences and occupations, rotations, or elections by peers could offer more flexibility, encourage fresh ideas, and better serve the changing demographics and needs of the populace.
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas. If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
