Estimated Time to Read: 3 minutes
When Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R) launched Operation Lone Star (OLS) in March 2021, it was portrayed as an urgent, short-term response to a perceived federal failure to secure the U.S.–Mexico border. Five years later, the initiative stands as one of the largest, most persistent state security expenditures in Texas history, raising questions about the permanence of emergency government and whether “temporary” ever truly means temporary.
From its inception, OLS marshaled unprecedented state resources: thousands of Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) troopers and National Guard members, extensive infrastructure investments, and new law enforcement authorities. Over time, the operation has expanded far beyond a rapid deployment, now encompassing long-term detention coordination, state-funded transportation of migrants to other states, border barriers, and continuing appropriations year after year.
In simple terms, Texas has spent billions on OLS since 2021. Reports from multiple independent observers, ranging from advocacy groups to media organizations, estimate the cumulative cost to taxpayers in excess of $10 billion to $11 billion so far. These funds have been drawn from state revenue and appropriations already constrained by Texas’s constitutional spending limits. Once these expenditures became institutionalized, they began to crowd out other priorities and reshape the state’s budgetary baseline.
Texas Policy Research (TPR) has acknowledged this dramatic shift in border-related policymaking as a central theme of the recent legislative session. In its 89th Legislative Session Policy Brief on Border Security, TPR noted that legislative actions intended to respond to the crisis “exposed the limits of constitutional authority” and “strained local law enforcement capacity,” highlighting a broader concern that emergency responses can expand and persist well beyond the conditions that prompted them.
That analysis aligns with a classic budgetary insight: governments expand rapidly in crisis and rarely fully relinquish the authorities or funding streams created for those crises. Once appropriators and agencies adjust their planning around new expenditures, repealing or reducing those commitments becomes politically and administratively difficult.
In the case of Operation Lone Star, the Texas Legislature has repeatedly reauthorized and funded the initiative as part of the state’s general appropriations process. Lawmakers considered billions more in border funding even as crossings decreased in 2025, suggesting that what was once “emergency” is now embedded into Texas’s fiscal and policy framework.
The persistence of Operation Lone Star illustrates several key structural dynamics:
- Institutionalization of extraordinary measures. What begins as a rapid frontier response becomes normalized through regular appropriations.
- Budgetary ratchet effects. Spending spikes in crisis are rarely reversed; rather, they raise the baseline for future budgets.
- Political incentives. Policymakers face pressure to maintain programs that offer visible action, regardless of whether the original emergency conditions continue.
Operation Lone Star’s evolution from an emergency operation into a long-term state enterprise underscores a broader lesson: unless explicitly time-limited and tied to measurable benchmarks, emergency government tends to morph into permanent government, with lasting fiscal and constitutional implications.
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
