A Closer Look at the Proposed Social Media Ban for Minors

Estimated Time to Read: 5 minutes

In recent years, the increasing presence of children on social media has raised significant concerns about their safety and well-being. In response to these concerns, Texas State Rep. Jared Patterson (R-Frisco) has introduced House Bill 186 (HB 186), a measure aimed at prohibiting minors under the age of 18 from accessing social media platforms altogether. This legislation seeks to establish clear legal boundaries for online platforms operating within the state while placing the responsibility for enforcement on social media companies themselves.

Understanding the Purpose of HB 186

At the heart of HB 186 is the recognition that social media platforms can expose children to a range of potentially harmful experiences, from cyberbullying to exposure to inappropriate content and addictive design features. The bill proposes a statewide prohibition on minors using social media platforms, to mitigate these risks and foster a safer digital environment. In doing so, the legislation mirrors efforts at the federal level to impose stricter regulations on technology companies, such as the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), but takes the concept a step further by instituting an outright ban.

Key Provisions of HB 186

To ensure compliance, HB 186 requires social media companies to implement stringent age verification measures. Before allowing an individual to create an account, platforms must verify that the user is at least 18 years old using what the bill terms “commercially reasonable methods” based on public or private transactional data. The legislation also places limits on how companies handle users’ personal information, requiring that any data collected during the verification process be deleted immediately once the verification is complete. This provision seeks to alleviate concerns regarding the potential misuse of personal data and protect users’ privacy.

In addition to restricting access, the bill grants parents and guardians the right to request the deletion of their child’s social media account. Upon receiving a verified request, social media platforms must remove the account within ten days and cease any further collection or storage of the minor’s personal information. This aspect of the legislation aims to empower parents with greater control over their children’s online activities, reinforcing the notion that guardians should play a key role in regulating their children’s digital footprint.

HB 186 introduces penalties for non-compliance, treating violations as deceptive trade practices under Texas law. This means that if a social media platform fails to enforce age restrictions, misuses personal data, or does not promptly delete an account upon request, it could face legal action from the Texas Attorney General’s Office. The bill sets January 1, 2026, as the official date when these provisions would begin to apply, allowing companies time to adjust their systems to meet the new requirements.

The Broader Context of Online Child Protection

The introduction of HB 186 aligns with broader national conversations surrounding the regulation of social media platforms and their influence on young users. Across the country, lawmakers have been exploring policies aimed at addressing the mental health and privacy challenges associated with social media use by children and teens. Supporters of such measures argue that platforms have not done enough to self-regulate and that legislative intervention is necessary to curb the negative impacts of excessive social media exposure, including anxiety, depression, and addiction-like behaviors.

However, HB 186 has also sparked significant debate regarding the balance between government intervention and parental responsibility. Critics argue that an outright ban on minors using social media could infringe on personal freedoms and limit access to valuable online resources for education, socialization, and self-expression. Some opponents contend that the role of regulating children’s online activity should rest primarily with parents rather than the state and that resources should instead be directed toward education and parental control tools.

Parents vs. Government: Who Should Regulate Social Media Access?

We recently provided a deeper exploration of this ongoing debate. We highlighted the tensions between those who advocate for stricter government oversight and those who believe empowering parents with better tools and information is a more effective solution. We underscored the potential unintended consequences of HB 186, such as challenges in enforcing the law, risks to data privacy, and the possibility of encouraging minors to seek workarounds, ultimately undermining the bill’s effectiveness.

Beyond the philosophical debate, there are also practical considerations regarding how the legislation would be implemented. Social media companies, many of which operate across multiple jurisdictions, may find it challenging to enforce age verification measures without creating significant barriers for all users. Additionally, questions remain about the technological feasibility of accurately verifying users’ ages without inadvertently collecting excessive personal information, potentially creating new privacy concerns.

The Future of HB 186 and Its Potential Impact

While the bill is scheduled to take effect in 2025, it is expected to face scrutiny from various stakeholders, including tech companies, privacy advocates, and parents. As lawmakers continue to weigh the merits and drawbacks of this approach, the outcome of HB 186 could set a precedent for other states considering similar measures to address the complex issue of children’s online safety.

As Texas policymakers deliberate on the future of this legislation, the conversation around social media and child safety continues to evolve. Whether through government mandates, industry self-regulation, or a combination of both, the challenge of ensuring a safer online environment for children remains a pressing issue with no easy answers. HB 186 represents one possible solution, but its implementation and long-term impact will ultimately depend on how effectively it balances the needs of parents, children, and the broader digital ecosystem.

Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!