According to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB), the bill would have no significant fiscal impact on the State of Texas. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), which is responsible for designing, constructing, and installing the highway markers commemorating the designation, is expected to absorb any associated costs within its existing budget and operational resources. This is consistent with other similar memorial highway bills, where signage expenses are typically modest and do not necessitate new appropriations.
The bill also carries no fiscal impact to local governments, as it does not impose any mandates or financial responsibilities on counties or municipalities. All implementation duties fall to the state transportation agency and are limited to signage along the designated portion of State Highway 345 in San Benito.
In sum, HB 1960 is a symbolic and ceremonial measure honoring Lieutenant Milton Resendez, with negligible financial effect on state operations and none on local jurisdictions. Its cost-neutral status contributes to its administrative feasibility and broad legislative support.
Texas Policy Research remains NEUTRAL on HB 1960 due to its ceremonial nature and limited policy impact. The bill proposes to designate a portion of State Highway 345 within the city limits of San Benito as the Lieutenant Milton Resendez Memorial Highway, in honor of a local law enforcement officer who died in the line of duty. Such memorial designations are common practice in Texas and serve symbolic, community-based purposes without altering legal rights or regulatory frameworks.
The measure requires the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to design and erect signage at the designated highway segment, in accordance with existing statutory provisions. Notably, under Section 225.021(c) of the Transportation Code, signage costs must be covered by private donations or grants, unless otherwise appropriated. As confirmed by the Legislative Budget Board, H.B. 1960 has no significant fiscal implications for state or local governments.
Because the bill does not modify substantive law or create new government responsibilities beyond commemorative signage, it has no direct effect on liberty principles such as individual liberty, free enterprise, or private property rights. It neither expands nor contracts the scope of government authority in a meaningful way.
While the intent behind HB 1960 is commendable and may have strong local and emotional resonance, from a policy analysis perspective, it is a non-substantive measure.