Texas Public Information Act | House Gov Oversight, 8.26.2026

Estimated Time to Read: 3 minutes

Texas Policy Research submitted the following written testimony to all members of the Texas House Select Committee on Governmental Oversight ahead of its interim hearing.

Download the Submitted Testimony

The text below reproduces the testimony as submitted to the committee.
The submitted document linked above is the authoritative version.

Chairman Vasut and Members of the Committee,

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments regarding the Texas Public Information Act and opportunities to strengthen government transparency.

The premise of the Public Information Act should be straightforward: government conducts the people's business using authority and resources entrusted to it by the people. Texans should therefore enjoy a strong presumption of access to information concerning how their government operates.

Making government transparent is a priority of the Texas Liberty Compact. Transparency enables taxpayers to scrutinize spending, evaluate public officials, identify waste or misconduct, and meaningfully participate in the policymaking process. A government that is difficult to observe is difficult to hold accountable.

The Legislature should review existing Public Information Act exceptions with a presumption favoring disclosure. Legitimate exceptions are necessary to protect matters such as personal privacy, sensitive security information, and certain law enforcement activities. Exceptions should nevertheless be narrowly tailored and periodically justified rather than allowed to become increasingly broad barriers to public scrutiny.

Lawmakers should also examine whether governmental bodies can frustrate legitimate requests through excessive costs, unnecessary delays, demands for clarification, or expansive interpretations of disclosure exceptions. Access theoretically guaranteed by statute provides little transparency if obtaining public records requires substantial financial resources, specialized legal knowledge, or prolonged disputes.

Technology should make government more transparent, not less. Frequently requested records, including expenditures, contracts, meeting materials, financial information, and other routinely public documents, should increasingly be proactively published online in searchable and machine-readable formats. Greater proactive disclosure can improve public access while reducing the administrative burden and expense of responding repeatedly to identical requests.

The Legislature should also ensure that transparency follows governmental activity regardless of the technology or intermediary used. Public business should not become private merely because officials communicate through personal devices or accounts, nor should government evade transparency by outsourcing governmental functions or transferring public resources to private intermediaries.

Public notice requirements deserve similar scrutiny. Technical compliance is not necessarily meaningful notice. Texans should be able to easily discover when governmental bodies will meet, what they will consider, and where supporting materials can be reviewed before decisions are made.

The guiding principle should remain simple: government information is presumptively public, and government should bear the burden of demonstrating why withholding it is necessary. Texas should make government easier to observe, not harder.

Thank you for your consideration.


Sources


Support Our Work

Texas Policy Research relies on generous donors across Texas. If you found this helpful, please consider supporting our efforts.

Donate Today

Stay in the Loop

Subscribe for occasional emails with new research, event details, and ways to engage with Texas policy.

Subscribe for Updates