Texas PUC Responds to Abbott on Data Centers

Estimated Time to Read: 7 minutes

Over the past several months, Texas has witnessed a rapid evolution in state policy surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure, data centers, and large electrical loads. Governor Greg Abbott's (R) June directive to the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) accelerated that discussion by asking regulators to ensure that the rapid expansion of large data centers does not come at the expense of existing Texans.

On July 17, the PUC formally responded, outlining actions already taken, rulemakings currently underway, and several statutory changes it believes lawmakers should consider during the 90th Texas Legislature, which is set to begin in January 2027.

The response represents one of the clearest roadmaps yet for how Texas intends to manage growing electricity demand from large computational loads. It also provides lawmakers with an early preview of several energy policy debates that will likely dominate the upcoming legislative session.

Texas Policy Research (TPR) has consistently maintained that data centers themselves are not the problem. Texas benefits from private investment, technological innovation, and infrastructure development. The challenge is ensuring that government policy protects taxpayers, ratepayers, and private property while avoiding unnecessary regulation that could discourage economic growth.

Texas Data Center Policy Is Moving Beyond Executive Directives

Governor Abbott's June directive initiated a series of regulatory actions aimed at ensuring new large electrical loads pay for the infrastructure they require while protecting electric reliability.

The PUC's response demonstrates that many of those directives are already being implemented under existing statutory authority. Rather than waiting for legislative action, regulators have adopted new forecasting standards, revised transmission planning processes, initiated multiple rulemakings, and coordinated closely with ERCOT to address rapidly increasing demand from large computational facilities.

That also means lawmakers will not be starting from scratch next session. Instead, they will be reviewing regulatory changes already underway while determining whether additional statutory authority is necessary.

Data Centers Must Pay Their Own Way

Perhaps the most significant policy shift involves who pays for new transmission infrastructure.

The PUC concluded earlier this year that rapidly growing demand from large computational loads is creating substantial pressure for additional transmission investment. Left unchanged, those costs would increasingly be recovered through electric rates paid by existing consumers.

To address that concern, the Commission has begun revising transmission cost allocation rules so infrastructure costs are more closely aligned with the customers creating those costs. The proposed rules would require large loads to provide financial security before connecting to the grid, begin paying transmission charges once capacity becomes available even if operations have not yet begun, and use forfeited financial security to offset transmission costs borne by other consumers. The Commission expects to finalize those rules by December 2026.

From a public policy perspective, this represents a notable departure from simply socializing infrastructure costs across all ratepayers. Instead, regulators are moving toward a cost causation model where those creating new demand bear a greater share of the associated infrastructure expense.

ERCOT's Batch Zero Framework

Another major development highlighted in the PUC's response is ERCOT's recently adopted Batch Zero interconnection framework.

Historically, large loads were evaluated largely on an individual basis. Under Batch Zero, ERCOT will evaluate qualifying projects together, determine how much capacity can be reliably served by location and year, identify necessary transmission upgrades, and allocate available transmission capacity among qualifying projects.

Future batch studies are expected to become the permanent framework for evaluating large loads across the ERCOT system.

For developers, the process introduces greater predictability and more coordinated infrastructure planning. For policymakers, Batch Zero illustrates an important principle. Texas is not restricting growth. Rather, it is improving how that growth is planned.

Grid Reliability Remains the Primary Policy Objective

Although much of the public discussion has centered on data centers themselves, the PUC repeatedly emphasizes that its primary objective is preserving electric reliability.

The Commission outlines several initiatives intended to improve forecasting accuracy, require greater financial commitment from prospective large loads, encourage voluntary load curtailment during emergency conditions, and gather better operational information before new facilities are approved for interconnection.

Those measures largely focus on ensuring infrastructure planning keeps pace with demand rather than attempting to suppress demand itself.

Growing electricity demand is often a sign of economic growth. Texas has historically benefited from expanding manufacturing, energy production, industrial development, and technology investment. The policy challenge is not preventing new demand but ensuring sufficient infrastructure exists to support it.

The PUC Wants Additional Legislative Authority

While much of the Governor's directive can be implemented administratively, the PUC also identifies several areas where it believes legislative action would strengthen consumer protections.

First, the Commission recommends clarifying its authority to establish reliability requirements that apply directly to large computational loads rather than relying exclusively on utilities as intermediaries.

Second, the Commission recommends requiring large computational load facilities to register with both the PUC and ERCOT so regulators have better operational information when planning the electric system.

Finally, the Commission recommends expanding the Lone Star Infrastructure Protection Act, Senate Bill 2116 (SB 2116) from the 87th Legislative Session (2021), so certain foreign-linked entities operating large computational facilities would also be covered by existing critical infrastructure protections.

These proposals are likely to receive significant attention during the 90th Legislature and will deserve careful review to ensure they improve reliability without creating unnecessary regulatory expansion.

The 90th Texas Legislature Should Focus on Better Energy Policy

As lawmakers prepare for the upcoming legislative session, several broader policy questions remain.

Texas should continue pursuing policies that require infrastructure costs to be borne by those creating new demand rather than shifting those costs onto existing residential consumers whenever possible.

The Legislature should also preserve predictable regulatory processes that encourage long-term private investment. Investors are far more likely to build generation, transmission, and advanced computing infrastructure when rules are clear, stable, and consistently applied.

At the same time, lawmakers should be cautious about creating data center-specific regulations that could later become templates for regulating other industries. Artificial intelligence infrastructure may dominate today's headlines, but tomorrow another rapidly growing industry could face similar political pressure. Technology-neutral policies generally produce better long-term outcomes than industry-specific regulation.

Likewise, concerns surrounding water use, local land use conflicts, transmission infrastructure, and property rights should continue to be addressed using established legal frameworks whenever possible instead of creating entirely new regulatory systems targeted at one industry.

Texas Can Protect Ratepayers Without Discouraging Investment

The PUC's response demonstrates that Texas regulators are attempting to strike a careful balance.

They are acknowledging that rapidly growing electrical demand requires new planning tools while also recognizing that Texas's economic success depends on remaining an attractive place to invest.

Many of the Commission's current initiatives are consistent with longstanding conservative and free market principles. Requiring infrastructure users to bear more of their own costs, improving planning transparency, and protecting existing ratepayers represent legitimate policy objectives.

The Legislature's task during the 90th Session will be determining where existing authority is sufficient and where additional statutory authority is genuinely necessary.

Texas Policy Research has consistently argued that the state's competitive advantage has never been government micromanagement. It has been predictable laws, respect for private property, free enterprise, and infrastructure capable of supporting continued growth.

If lawmakers remain focused on those principles, Texas can continue leading the nation in artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing, and data center investment while ensuring taxpayers and ratepayers are not asked to subsidize that success.

---