Health Care Delivery and Finance | House Health Care, 9.1.2026

Estimated Time to Read: 3 minutes

Texas Policy Research submitted the following written testimony to all members of the Texas House Select Committee on Health Care Affordability ahead of its interim hearing.

Download the Submitted Testimony

The text below reproduces the testimony as submitted to the committee.
The submitted document linked above is the authoritative version.

Chairman Frank and Members of the Select Committee on Health Care Affordability:

Thank you for the opportunity to provide written testimony regarding improvements to health care delivery and emerging financing models that can reduce costs for Texans.

Texas should approach affordability by asking a basic question: how can we restore a more direct relationship between patients, providers, and the dollars paying for care? Much of health care operates differently from ordinary markets. Patients frequently do not know the price of a service before receiving it, the person consuming the service is often separated from the person paying for it, and layers of insurers, administrators, and other intermediaries influence both payment and access. These arrangements weaken price signals and can increase administrative costs.

Alternative delivery models demonstrate another approach. Direct patient care allows patients or their designees to contract directly with providers for care, often through transparent membership, subscription, or service fees. Direct-pay providers can similarly compete on upfront prices rather than navigating complex third-party reimbursement systems. These models give patients greater ability to compare cost and value while allowing providers to spend fewer resources on billing administration.

The 89th Legislature took an important step with HB 541, expanding Texas law from direct primary care to broader direct patient care. The law allows agreements covering health care services provided by physicians and other practitioners, including telemedicine and telehealth, and makes clear that these arrangements are not insurance. Texas should build upon that progress.

Lawmakers should identify remaining statutory or regulatory barriers to direct patient care, direct-pay services, health savings arrangements, and other patient-directed financing models. They should also ensure insurers and other intermediaries cannot prevent patients or providers from choosing lawful direct-pay alternatives simply because those transactions bypass traditional reimbursement systems. These models need not replace insurance. Insurance can serve an important role in protecting Texans against large and unexpected expenses. But Texans should have greater freedom to combine such protection with arrangements that allow routine and predictable care to be purchased more directly.

Affordability will not be achieved simply by shifting health care costs among taxpayers, employers, insurers, and patients. Texas should pursue reforms that reduce the underlying cost of care by expanding competition, reducing unnecessary intermediaries, and giving patients greater control over how their health care dollars are spent.

Thank you for your consideration.


Sources

  • TPR Bill Analysis: House Bill 541 (HB 541), 89th Legislative Session (2025)
  • Written Testimony, Innovations in Health Care Plans | House Health Care, 9.1.2026
  • Written Testimony, Small and Mid-Size Employer Coverage | House Health Care, 9.1.2026
  • Written Testimony, Consumer Engagement, Cost and Quality | House Health Care, 9.1.2026
  • Written Testimony, Health Care Spending | House Health Care Affordability, 4.30.2026

Support Our Work

Texas Policy Research relies on generous donors across Texas. If you found this helpful, please consider supporting our efforts.

Donate Today

Stay in the Loop

Subscribe for occasional emails with new research, event details, and ways to engage with Texas policy.

Subscribe for Updates