Small and Mid-Size Employer Coverage | House Health Care, 9.1.2026

Estimated Time to Read: 3 minutes

Texas Policy Research submitted the following written testimony to all members of the Texas House Select Committee on Health Care Affordability ahead of its interim hearing.

  • Committee: House Select Committee on Health Care Affordability
  • Hearing Date: September 1, 2026
  • Context: 89th Legislature, Interim
  • Subject: Small/Mid-Size Employers – Access to Health Care Coverage
  • Position: Informational
  • Submitted By: Jeramy Kitchen
  • Entity: Texas Policy Research Action (TPRA)
Download the Submitted Testimony

The text below reproduces the testimony as submitted to the committee.
The submitted document linked above is the authoritative version.

Chairman Frank and Members of the Select Committee on Health Care Affordability:

Thank you for the opportunity to provide written testimony regarding barriers faced by small and mid-size employers seeking to provide health care benefits to their employees.

For many employers, particularly small businesses, the problem is no longer simply whether they want to provide health benefits. It is whether they can afford the increasingly expensive and complex system through which those benefits are traditionally provided. Average annual premiums for employer-sponsored family coverage have climbed dramatically over the past two decades, placing growing pressure on both employers and workers.

Texas should respond by expanding choices, not by subsidizing or further regulating the existing model. Traditional group insurance should remain an option, but it should not be treated as the only meaningful way for an employer to help workers obtain health care. Employers should have greater freedom to provide defined contributions that workers can use toward coverage suited to their circumstances, including individual plans and other portable arrangements. Benefits that follow the individual rather than the job can be especially valuable to workers moving between traditional employment, contract work, and self-employment.

Texas should also continue removing barriers between patients and providers. The 89th Legislature took an important step with HB 541 by expanding Texas's direct patient care framework beyond primary care. Under current law, employers may be parties to direct patient care agreements on behalf of patients, while those arrangements are expressly treated as something other than insurance.

Lawmakers should build upon that approach by ensuring employers can incorporate direct patient care, direct-pay services, health savings arrangements, and appropriate catastrophic coverage into employee benefit strategies without unnecessary regulatory interference. Texas should also examine state mandates and regulations that increase the price of insurance or discourage new products from entering the market. A benefit mandate may be well-intentioned, but every required benefit carries a cost. Small businesses and their employees should have greater freedom to decide which coverage provides sufficient value to justify that cost.

The goal should not merely be to increase the number of employers purchasing conventional insurance. It should be to increase Texans' access to affordable health care. The Legislature should pursue reforms that expand competition, portability, consumer choice, and direct relationships between patients and providers while resisting new mandates, subsidies, and regulatory structures that further increase costs.

Thank you for your consideration.


Sources


Support Our Work

Texas Policy Research relies on generous donors across Texas. If you found this helpful, please consider supporting our efforts.

Donate Today

Stay in the Loop

Subscribe for occasional emails with new research, event details, and ways to engage with Texas policy.

Subscribe for Updates